To: dhs12345
Who knows, but I'm thinking it's not a good sign that they've hired the same lawyer who represented the payoff kid and his family.
To: GovernmentShrinker
Since the 1993 payoff, the law has been amended to preclude the child from withdrawing from a case of alleged molestation. If you accuse you must cooperate and testify. A payoff won't work this time.
33 posted on
11/19/2003 1:25:01 PM PST by
kmiller1k
(remain calm)
To: GovernmentShrinker
it's not a good sign that they've hired the same lawyer who represented the payoff kid and his familyLooks like I'm not the only one who heard "Cha-CHING" when the article mentioned that fact.
37 posted on
11/19/2003 1:26:36 PM PST by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
To: GovernmentShrinker
Hope not. Otherwise it will happen again.
80 posted on
11/19/2003 1:58:26 PM PST by
dhs12345
To: GovernmentShrinker
The DA said at the press conference that the law now is that the kid MUST testify against Jackson. They'll probably sue later. I think they should also sue the first family for letting Jackson off the hook so he could turn around and do it to other kids. Wonder how many kids he's molested in the last ten years.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson