Replies

Other than living in the same city. There's a lot of casual relationships I have that leave no trace in this world and after one or both of us is dead it'll be impossible to tell if I knew the person. Must have been even easier back in 1963 when we had fewer surveilance cameras and less general beaurocracy.

Like I said, that was just a theory I came up with off the top of my head. No matter how you slice it the Oswald shoots three shots with a bolt action rifle theory is completely BS, and ricocheting bullet that falls onto the stretcher on looks like a sample bullet fired into a chamber for analysis is even bigger BS. The lone gunman theory CANNOT standup as it stands, the only physical evidence we have (as miniscule as it is) ridicules it.

I don't claim to have all of the answers about the Kennedy Assassination, but I do have one theory that explains the obvious coverup that happened in the wake of the assassination. My theory is that there was a Cuban component in the conspiracy to kill Kennedy, and that component became very obvious to everyone involved in investigating the assassination within the first 48 hours or so afterwards. Now they had a problem on their hands, do they let the public know that Cubans (and by proxy, Russians as well) were involved in killing Kennedy? Or do they propose some "lone-nut" theory designed to prevent public outrage that could have quite possibly led to all out nuclear war with the Russians?

Given the best of a couple of poor choices, I believe they did the right thing. This explains the obvious holes in the Warren Commission report and the obvious coverup activities that happened in the wake of the assassination, and also explains why we have normalized relations with every single Communist nation in the world with one exception, that exception being Cuba. We will not normalize relations with Cuba until Fidel Castro is cold in the ground. Strike the king, and you pay for the rest of your days. That's my theory and I'm sticking with it.