Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Az Joe
Sorry dude, even if Oswald was a shooter (which I'm not convinced of), even if Oswald was the only shooter (which I don't believe for a second), there was still enough wierd stuff going on that there had to be others involved in the planning and some form of cover-up. The multiple arrests alone proves this was no simple lone-gunman.
69 posted on 11/19/2003 12:42:11 PM PST by discostu (You figure that's gotta be jelly cos jam just don't shake like that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
What multiple arrests are you talking about?

The best and most thorough analysis of the evidence leads to one likely conclusion, in my humble opinion. Oswald did it, alone.

All this other stuff about CIA, Cuban and mob contacts means nothing. No other person or persons have been put forward as having any credible links to the shooting that day.

The simplest explanantion is that Oswald did it. If anything else is believed it has to involve at least dozens, if not hundreds, of other people. It just isn't likely that something like that could happen and stay so secret in my view.

I am open to anything but at some point I believe that one must settle on a most likely scenario, not a perfect scenario, just the most likely one.

Of course, new technologies may emerge that would be able to better discern the truth and the examine the existing evidence. There is always a chance that that will happen.

That's my two cents anyway.
73 posted on 11/19/2003 12:54:50 PM PST by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson