To: tpaine
I haven't seen any drawing or animation that seems to match the body positions, from either the conspiracy or no-conspiracy crowds.
In the end there are just too many wierd lose ends. To me there are four key questions all of which must be answered to buy into the official version:
Why was Oswald arrested twice on that day
How in the world did he get 3 shots off with a bolt action rifle with any degree of accuracy
How did the bullet do what it's supposed to have
Why are the records sealed until long after everybody involved will be dead
As long as those four are wide open, especially the last, I can't believe the Warren Report is accurate.
143 posted on
11/19/2003 6:08:37 PM PST by
discostu
(You figure that's gotta be jelly cos jam just don't shake like that)
To: discostu
And there's always the lagging question: if it really was just a lonenut then why are the record sealed?
Bingo!
145 posted on
11/19/2003 6:27:07 PM PST by
motzman
("Vote Quimby")
To: discostu
I haven't seen any drawing or animation that seems to match the body positions It was just on Court TV. One bullet through both Kennedy and Connally in a straight line back to the 6th floor of the book depository.
147 posted on
11/19/2003 6:34:29 PM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: discostu
How in the world did he get 3 shots off with a bolt action rifle with any degree of accuracy?
How did the bullet do what it's supposed to have?
-discostu-
See #139 for some speculations of mine on the single bullet 'theory':
Some Relevant Facts About the JFK Assassination
Address:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1024668/posts?page=139
161 posted on
11/19/2003 7:05:58 PM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but FRs flying monkey squad brings out the Rickenbacker in me.)
To: discostu
Up until the last few years I would have disagreed with you and followed the company line. I am certainly no friend of the Kennedy dynasty or the Oliver Stone propagandists. I always scoffed at the conspiracy notion but then I lived through the clinton presidency. That opened my eyes to the power of a central government to obstruct justice and truth. I used to say that until the truth of the Vince Foster death was made known that I would never believe in the cia, fbi, etc again. With that in view I now have serious doubts about what happend in 63 when I was in the seventh grade.
To: discostu
The thing that has always struck me about this case was the unexplained disapperance of evidence. John Kennedy's brain was removed and disappeared. The original autopsy records were destroyed (by the coroner, I believe). There are no surviving notes or recordings of Oswald's police interogations. There are those who were in Dealy Plaza who claim that film was taken from them that never saw the light of day.
And of course, the prime suspect was murdered in police custody and thus forever silenced.
The History Channel described how the presidential limosine was flown to Washington, taken to the White House garage, and then for two days no one logged in to examine the car. The crime of the century, Oswald dead, no one at the time could have known if Oswald had acted alone only two days after the assassination, and nobody was even curious to go look at the limosine? (they claim that the car was really taken to Detroit to have the windshield replaced).
I don't claim to be an expert, and I have no idea what really happened, but I just think its just a little odd that a great deal of important evidence doesn't exist. To me, the events in Dallas in November 1963 border on the surrealistic.
202 posted on
11/20/2003 7:04:26 PM PST by
fhayek
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson