We need less federal control, not more.
And if there was to be an amendment I think it should be to remove the requirement that states must recognise each others marriages.
Then states can do what they want and suffer or enjoy the consequences.
I could go along with that. That could even be the Marriage Amendment.
That is a very good idea, but it does not attack the root of the problem.
The more I think about it, the more it seems to me that the power of the Judicial branch should be radically circumscribed, directly, by a Constitutional amendment removing court jurisdiction over a broad range of domestic affairs.
That way, the battle would only have to be fought once.
As it is, with a so-called "marriage" amendment, court decisions requiring constitutional amendments will proliferate much faster than teh Constitution can be, or should be, amended.