[Always Right]

It was a decision about state constitutionality. They need to go back and rectify a poorly written law.

LOL, what the f are you talking about. All they did was define what a marriage was. The court said it was unfair to do that. It had nothing to do with whether the law was written poorly.

[Protagoras]

They need to have it in clearly in the constitution that they can do that. That's what the f I'm talking about. They will fix it. But not before you die from hyperventiling about it.

Your idea for a federal constitutional amendment is goofy.