Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass. Supreme Court Rules - Gay Couples have the Right to Marry
FoxNews | 11-18-03 | FoxNews

Posted on 11/18/2003 7:02:44 AM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Mass. Supreme Court rules that illegal for state to deny marriage license to gay couples.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: activistjudges; aids; antifamily; gay; godsjudgement; goodridge; hiv; homos; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; judicalactivism; justdamn; legislatingsin; oligarchy; pederasty; perversion; perverts; prisoners; protectmarriage; queers; reprobates; romans1; samesexmarriage; sodomites; sodomy; tyrannyofthefew
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 561-565 next last
To: netmilsmom
It's closer to 2% to 4%. The 10% number was debunked as pro-gay propaganda. That's the way I remember it anyway.
121 posted on 11/18/2003 7:40:46 AM PST by Sir Gawain (The Koran...when you're out of toilet paper, Allah is there for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: kdmhcdcfld
>>The gay lobby in this country wanted everyone to believe that 10 percent of the population was either gay or lesbian.

Try about 4 to 5 percent... <<

I stand corrected and greatly relieved!
122 posted on 11/18/2003 7:41:29 AM PST by netmilsmom (Lost my 4th E-Bay auction, Kid's sick, Dad in CA & out of coffee - Just shoot me now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: xzins; Salem; Geist Krieger
"Mass. Supreme Court Rules - Gay Couples have the Right to Marry"

Hmmm... wonder who in the world could ever be the inspiration for THIS perversion (besides the people of Mass. for putting them in power and allowing it to happen).

Yes - I think mairrage between two men is perfectly natural. In fact I . .

Barney Frank on Abortion
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on banning human cloning, including medical research. (Jul 2001)
  • Voted NO on banning Family Planning funding in US aid abroad. (May 2001)
  • Voted NO on federal crime to harm fetus while committing other crimes. (Apr 2001)
  • Voted NO on banning partial-birth abortions. (Apr 2000)
  • Voted NO on barring transporting minors to get an abortion. (Jun 1999)
Barney Frank on Budget & Economy
Click here for .
    No stance on record.
Barney Frank on Civil Rights
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on Constitutional amendment prohibiting Flag Desecration. (Jul 2001)
  • Voted NO on banning gay adoptions in DC. (Jul 1999)
  • Voted NO on Amendment to prohibit burning the US flag. (Jun 1999)
  • Voted NO on ending preferential treatment by race in college admissions. (May 1998)
  • Constitutional Amendment for equal rights by gender. (Mar 2001)
Barney Frank on Corporations
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on Bankruptcy Overhaul requiring partial debt repayment. (Mar 2001)
Barney Frank on Crime
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted YES on funding for alternative sentencing instead of more prisons. (Jun 2000)
  • Voted NO on more prosecution and sentencing for juvenile crime. (Jun 1999)
  • Voted YES on maintaining right of habeus corpus in Death Penalty Appeals. (Mar 1996)
  • Voted NO on making federal death penalty appeals harder. (Feb 1995)
  • Voted YES on replacing death penalty with life imprisonment. (Apr 1994)
  • Moratorium on death penalty; more DNA testing. (Mar 2001)
  • More funding and stricter sentencing for hate crimes. (Apr 2001)
  • Require DNA testing for all federal executions. (Mar 2001)
Barney Frank on Drugs
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on military border patrols to battle drugs & terrorism. (Sep 2001)
  • Voted NO on prohibiting needle exchange & medical marijuana in DC. (Oct 1999)
  • Legalize medical marijuana. (Jul 2001)
Barney Frank on Education
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on requiring states to test students. (May 2001)
  • Voted NO on allowing vouchers in DC schools. (Aug 1998)
  • Voted NO on vouchers for private & parochial schools. (Nov 1997)
  • Voted NO on giving federal aid only to schools allowing voluntary prayer. (Mar 1994)
  • Reduce class size to 18 children in grades 1 to 3. (Mar 2001)
Barney Frank on Energy & Oil
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted YES on raising CAFE standards; incentives for alternative fuels. (Aug 2001)
  • Voted YES on prohibiting oil drilling & development in ANWR. (Aug 2001)
  • Voted YES on starting implementation of Kyoto Protocol. (Jun 2000)
  • Regulate wholesale electricity & gas prices. (Mar 2001)
  • Preserve Alaska's ANWR instead of drilling it. (Feb 2001)
Barney Frank on Environment
Click here for .
    No stance on record.
Barney Frank on Families & Children
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on reducing Marriage Tax by $399B over 10 years. (Mar 2001)
Barney Frank on Foreign Policy
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted YES on keeping Cuba travel ban until political prisoners released. (Jul 2001)
  • Voted NO on withholding $244M in UN Back Payments until US seat restored. (May 2001)
  • Voted YES on $156M to IMF for 3rd-world debt reduction. (Jul 2000)
  • Voted NO on Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China. (May 2000)
  • Voted YES on $15.2 billion for foreign operations. (Nov 1999)
  • Multi-year commitment to Africa for food & medicine. (Apr 2001)
  • Urge China to respect religious freedom. (Mar 2001)
Barney Frank on Free Trade
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on withdrawing from the WTO. (Jun 2000)
  • Voted NO on 'Fast Track' authority for trade agreements. (Sep 1998)
  • No MFN for China; condition trade on human rights. (Nov 1999)
Barney Frank on Government Reform
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on banning soft money donations to national political parties. (Jul 2001)
  • Voted YES on banning soft money. (Sep 1999)
Barney Frank on Gun Control
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1. (Jun 1999)
Barney Frank on Health Care
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on allowing suing HMOs, but under federal rules & limited award. (Aug 2001)
  • Voted NO on Prescription Drug Coverage under Medicare. (Jun 2000)
  • Voted NO on banning physician-assisted suicide. (Oct 1999)
  • Voted NO on establishing tax-exempt Medical Savings Accounts. (Oct 1999)
  • MEDS Plan: Cover senior Rx under Medicare. (Jan 2001)
  • Make health care a right, not a privilege. (Nov 1999)
Barney Frank on Homeland Security
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted YES on $266 billion Defense Appropriations bill. (Jul 1999)
  • Voted NO on deploying SDI. (Mar 1999)
  • Take US nuclear missiles off high alert. (Aug 2001)
  • End the use of anti-personnel mines. (Mar 2001)
Barney Frank on Immigration
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted YES on extending Immigrant Residency rules. (May 2001)
  • Voted YES on more immigrant visas for skilled workers. (Sep 1998)
Barney Frank on Infrastructure
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Promote internet via Congressional Internet Caucus. (Jan 2001)
  • Criminal penalties for e-mail spamming. (Feb 2001)
Barney Frank on Jobs
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on $167B over 10 years for farm price supports. (Oct 2001)
  • Voted NO on zero-funding OSHA's Ergonomics Rules instead of $4.5B. (Mar 2001)
Barney Frank on Principles & Values
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Religious affiliation: Jewish. (Nov 2000)
  • Member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. (Oct 2001)
  • Profiled in "Jews in American Politics". (Jan 2001)
Barney Frank on Social Security
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on raising 401(k) limits & making pension plans more portable. (May 2001)
  • Voted NO on reducing tax payments on Social Security benefits. (Jul 2000)
  • Voted YES on strengthening the Social Security Lockbox. (May 1999)
Barney Frank on Tax Reform
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on $99.5B economic stimulus: capital gains & income tax cuts. (Oct 2001)
  • Voted NO on Tax Cut Package of $958B over 10 years. (May 2001)
  • Voted NO on eliminating the Estate Tax. (Apr 2001)
  • Voted NO on eliminating the "marriage penalty". (Jul 2000)
  • Voted NO on repealing the estate tax ("death tax"). (Jun 2000)
  • Voted NO on $46 billion in tax cuts for small business. (Mar 2000)
  • American People's Dividend: Give $300 to every person. (Feb 2001)
Barney Frank on War & Peace
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Avoid using anti-terrorism power for political purposes. (Nov 2001)
  • Voted NO on disallowing the invasion of Kosovo. (May 1999)
  • Condemns anti-Muslim bigotry in name of anti-terrorism. (Oct 2001)
Barney Frank on Welfare & Poverty
Click here for OR click here for .
  • Voted NO on treating religious organizations equally for tax breaks. (Jul 2001)
  • Voted NO on responsible fatherhood via faith-based organizations. (Nov 1999)
  • Reduce the concentration of wealth & wage inequality. (Nov 1999)

123 posted on 11/18/2003 7:41:49 AM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Let me add. Just as vulgar as the act itself. Agreed???????????????????????
124 posted on 11/18/2003 7:42:02 AM PST by chachacha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: PBRSTREETGANG
hunting or eloping? LOL

Maybe in the mountains of Arkansas a new kind of Hillbilly is being born!

125 posted on 11/18/2003 7:42:23 AM PST by GeronL (Visit www.geocities.com/geronl.....and.....www.returnoftheprimitive.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
If they throw rice after a marriage ceremony symbolizing fertility, what would they throw after a gay marriage?

Gerbil turds

126 posted on 11/18/2003 7:42:37 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Which is why you need one (if you need one at all) that clearly outlines the power of the states. Else you're going to end up with Constitutional Amendment CXXXIV, the right of the national government to make sure we're all wearing our seat belts..
127 posted on 11/18/2003 7:43:00 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
Check your six O'clock until Jan 1
128 posted on 11/18/2003 7:44:09 AM PST by Not now, Not ever! (/o/o//oo (Oh Nooooooooo... It looks like somebody ran over it!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
ping on post #123
129 posted on 11/18/2003 7:44:23 AM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Nice pic of Rep Gerrald Nadler...
130 posted on 11/18/2003 7:44:32 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: chachacha
I thought we were done with this. I said my comment, you said yours. I don't think we need to get into the rest of it. Frankly other adults sex lives don't give me much interest unless of course they scream in the nite and disturb my sleep. To get preoccupied with whether what people do who are grown ups seems to me to be some perversion in and of itself. But that is just my opinion.
131 posted on 11/18/2003 7:44:45 AM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Well I hate to disagree with you BillyBob but stare decisis plays no role in American courts when the lefts agenda is at stake. I offer you Bowers as non precedent for Lawrence v Texas as proof of that assertion.

It is time for Congress to act because Kennedy's "transcendent liberty" penumbral thesis garnered from European precedent and mores is now the law of the land.

132 posted on 11/18/2003 7:44:46 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
From what I understand, IF this holds and gay couples are sanctioned in Massachusettes, and IF the gay couple is from, say, Florida....

...Florida has to recognize the marriage....UNLESS...

...Florida is one of the 37 states that has already passed the Defense of Marriage Act...and therefore, would NOT recognize, nor under law have to recognize, these marriages.

Does anyone know which are the 37 states that has passed this law?

133 posted on 11/18/2003 7:45:18 AM PST by Guenevere (..., .a long time Florida resident and voter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
It's funny how so many people in the east, where so much thinking went on at the founding of this nation, have now lost their minds.
134 posted on 11/18/2003 7:45:35 AM PST by Terriergal (Psalm 11: 3 "When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
How about two women and a dog? How about three men and a sheep? It could be endless!

How about an adult and a child? I think that is the ultimate goal of the homosexual agenda.The ACLU is also part of this agenda, hence their support of NAMBLA.

I'd like to see a comparative study of the incidence of pedophilia between straight and homosexual men. Since it is predominately a "man" crime I wonder if it's also more of a crime among the homosexuals.

135 posted on 11/18/2003 7:45:36 AM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: chachacha
Now you are just being judgemental. /sarc off/
136 posted on 11/18/2003 7:45:36 AM PST by Dr.Zoidberg (I've been making fine jewelry for years, apparently.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
That's why I ignored that remark. Some act as though oral/anal sex is something strictly for gays.
137 posted on 11/18/2003 7:45:57 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
It amazes me that some people simply don't understand that combining male/female is a unique arrangement unlike any other combination.

Woe to those who call good evil and evil good.
138 posted on 11/18/2003 7:46:00 AM PST by xzins (Proud to be Army!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: oopimrehs
>>Just ordinary young professionals, not your crazy Gay Pride types<<

Sounds good, but the problem is this.
When I was in my twenties, I lived with my widowed mom. I wanted to put her on my health insurance. I could not. If all the gays wanted was the ability to share insurance and the right to say what happens in a health crisis, I would say ok. They want a marriage. That offends me. The gays have the money behind them to be in my face. And my kids' face.

139 posted on 11/18/2003 7:47:21 AM PST by netmilsmom (Lost my 4th E-Bay auction, Kid's sick, Dad in CA & out of coffee - Just shoot me now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: oopimrehs
What is the rational basis for denying any two or more people the right to "marry" under your notion of marriage? Why can't two sisters, a mother and daughter, two friends or a group of friend in platonic relationships marry under this system of jurisprudence?
140 posted on 11/18/2003 7:47:32 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 561-565 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson