Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SQUEAMISH SCOTT
The NY Post ^ | November 18, 2003 | HOWARD BREUER

Posted on 11/18/2003 5:50:38 AM PST by runningbear

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-217 last
To: MEG33
One of the other websites has a timeline which mentions the blue wrapping tarp getting away from him while out in the bay in the wee hours. I'm not sure if that is conjecture or in evidence.

That writer suggests that he went back on the 24th to see if he could find the tarp, not just to check to see if the body had risen.

Maybe he was still hoping to use the golf alibi, but too many people saw him up there on the 24th.

His phone call to 'Laci' probably was his brilliant scheme to exploit Plan B, genius that he thinks he is. lol

Pinz
201 posted on 11/19/2003 7:53:33 AM PST by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: pinz-n-needlez
That's what I'm guessing, but the doctor's remarks about "wetness alternating with dryness" (not an exact quote) seems to be more supportive of your idea that maybe the mineralization happened while she was lying on the shore.

You know, there's a certain type of crab trap that is a big rectangle made of wire. You can see into the trap, b/c it's just wires; you can look into the water and see how many crabs are in the trap. It has an opening that crabs can enter, but which they can't exit. You just attach a piece of fresh meat on the inside, and they go in and start eating away at the meat. Crabs are voracious feeders.

Now that I think again of how he probably put chicken wire around her body, it makes me think that he set it up almost like those crab traps--except here, the bait was a real human being. UGH!!
202 posted on 11/19/2003 7:58:12 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
Oh,gee,let me cling to the fantasy that the concrete mix got on her and left a clear trail to the concrete dust in the boat and at the warehouse.I can dream,can't I?
203 posted on 11/19/2003 8:10:59 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Okay! Actually I'm hoping for that fantasy to be right!

In the meantime, for comic relief, I see Maggie May has posted for us excerpts from the Jan. 6 conversation, including Scott's humorous assertion to Amber, "I never cheated on you."

Amber caught that absudity right away: he never cheated on her...except he was married the whole time he was with her? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!
204 posted on 11/19/2003 8:20:28 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
I found the whole hearing transcript for yesterday.."Longing to hold onto you" somehow turned my stomach the most.Even Roy Black said the jury is going to hate him when they hear this tape.His pregnant wife has disappeared and he is talking to Amber like this.

I just know there has to be something else in those tapes that is incriminating.He is just too stupid and arrogant to be too careful.
205 posted on 11/19/2003 8:29:33 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: drjulie
Absolutely. Scott Peterson has lied his way through life up until and including now. This guy can make up lies on the spot. I doubt he can distinguish between truth and lies. As long as what he says gets him by for the moment that is all that matters.
206 posted on 11/19/2003 10:50:24 AM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
To be fair to Amber, the detective was right there coaching her on what to ask

I know but looking back I wonder if another approach would have been more constructive. As it is the exchange looks equally planned from both sides, each with clear objectives.

207 posted on 11/19/2003 10:51:41 AM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
His family are up to their ears in this "escape plan"!! I hope they are ALL charged.
208 posted on 11/19/2003 11:06:20 AM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
I thought Amber was introduced to Snott on November 20th. But there are 241 calls between Nov 19th and Feb. 19th?
209 posted on 11/19/2003 11:15:09 AM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Yes,obviously there was a shall we meet call?
210 posted on 11/19/2003 11:16:21 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Right. I get it.
211 posted on 11/19/2003 11:20:42 AM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Oh felt like upchucking reading about Laci and Conners reamains with the tape and all.

It is just sickening.
212 posted on 11/19/2003 8:48:49 PM PST by oceanperch (Respite care, it is a good thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Oh felt like upchucking reading about Laci and Conners reamains with the tape and all.

It is just sickening.


Oh and Scott being SQUEAMISH...WHAT A JERK HE IS!
213 posted on 11/19/2003 8:50:04 PM PST by oceanperch (Respite care, it is a good thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
One thing we know is in the tapes somewhere is Amber asking him if he had anything to do with Laci's disappearance, and his replying, "Yes...um...no, but I know who did..."

That's gonna be hard for his attorneys to explain.
214 posted on 11/20/2003 2:58:07 PM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
I was hoping that would be exposed in the prelim.I read on the Websleuths forum today There's a timeline thread and a good legal thread..by Midnite..about the middle of the thread is a good start.
215 posted on 11/21/2003 4:12:55 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
That's so funny, b/c just last night I, too, went and read the Websleuths timeline! It's good, isn't it?

One thing I wasn't sure about that was in their timeline was that at least 2 and maybe 4 people saw Scott at the Berkeley marina at about 12:00-12:15 p.m. on Dec. 24.
216 posted on 11/21/2003 5:31:06 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
There was a lot of stuff I recall but don't where I read it.I know when Scott was caught it was said he had a passport in his brother's name.I searched and found one article that said he had a partially filled out passport application.
I don't believe this was mentioned at the prelim. I know I heard about the witnesses to the boat launch..where ,I don't know.Crime News 2000 has a pretty good forum ,too.
217 posted on 11/21/2003 5:41:16 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-217 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson