Skip to comments.
SQUEAMISH SCOTT
The NY Post ^
| November 18, 2003
| HOWARD BREUER
Posted on 11/18/2003 5:50:38 AM PST by runningbear
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-217 last
To: MEG33
One of the other websites has a timeline which mentions the blue wrapping tarp getting away from him while out in the bay in the wee hours. I'm not sure if that is conjecture or in evidence.
That writer suggests that he went back on the 24th to see if he could find the tarp, not just to check to see if the body had risen.
Maybe he was still hoping to use the golf alibi, but too many people saw him up there on the 24th.
His phone call to 'Laci' probably was his brilliant scheme to exploit Plan B, genius that he thinks he is. lol
Pinz
To: pinz-n-needlez
That's what I'm guessing, but the doctor's remarks about "wetness alternating with dryness" (not an exact quote) seems to be more supportive of your idea that maybe the mineralization happened while she was lying on the shore.
You know, there's a certain type of crab trap that is a big rectangle made of wire. You can see into the trap, b/c it's just wires; you can look into the water and see how many crabs are in the trap. It has an opening that crabs can enter, but which they can't exit. You just attach a piece of fresh meat on the inside, and they go in and start eating away at the meat. Crabs are voracious feeders.
Now that I think again of how he probably put chicken wire around her body, it makes me think that he set it up almost like those crab traps--except here, the bait was a real human being. UGH!!
To: Devil_Anse
Oh,gee,let me cling to the fantasy that the concrete mix got on her and left a clear trail to the concrete dust in the boat and at the warehouse.I can dream,can't I?
203
posted on
11/19/2003 8:10:59 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
Okay! Actually I'm hoping for that fantasy to be right!
In the meantime, for comic relief, I see Maggie May has posted for us excerpts from the Jan. 6 conversation, including Scott's humorous assertion to Amber, "I never cheated on you."
Amber caught that absudity right away: he never cheated on her...except he was married the whole time he was with her? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!
To: Devil_Anse
I found the whole hearing transcript for yesterday.."Longing to hold onto you" somehow turned my stomach the most.Even Roy Black said the jury is going to hate him when they hear this tape.His pregnant wife has disappeared and he is talking to Amber like this.
I just know there has to be something else in those tapes that is incriminating.He is just too stupid and arrogant to be too careful.
205
posted on
11/19/2003 8:29:33 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: drjulie
Absolutely. Scott Peterson has lied his way through life up until and including now. This guy can make up lies on the spot. I doubt he can distinguish between truth and lies. As long as what he says gets him by for the moment that is all that matters.
206
posted on
11/19/2003 10:50:24 AM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: Velveeta
To be fair to Amber, the detective was right there coaching her on what to askI know but looking back I wonder if another approach would have been more constructive. As it is the exchange looks equally planned from both sides, each with clear objectives.
207
posted on
11/19/2003 10:51:41 AM PST
by
Dolphy
To: Devil_Anse
His family are up to their ears in this "escape plan"!! I hope they are ALL charged.
208
posted on
11/19/2003 11:06:20 AM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: MEG33
I thought Amber was introduced to Snott on November 20th. But there are 241 calls between Nov 19th and Feb. 19th?
209
posted on
11/19/2003 11:15:09 AM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: Canadian Outrage
Yes,obviously there was a shall we meet call?
210
posted on
11/19/2003 11:16:21 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
Right. I get it.
211
posted on
11/19/2003 11:20:42 AM PST
by
Canadian Outrage
(All us Western Canuks belong South)
To: runningbear
Oh felt like upchucking reading about Laci and Conners reamains with the tape and all.
It is just sickening.
212
posted on
11/19/2003 8:48:49 PM PST
by
oceanperch
(Respite care, it is a good thing.)
To: runningbear
Oh felt like upchucking reading about Laci and Conners reamains with the tape and all.
It is just sickening.
Oh and Scott being SQUEAMISH...WHAT A JERK HE IS!
213
posted on
11/19/2003 8:50:04 PM PST
by
oceanperch
(Respite care, it is a good thing.)
To: MEG33
One thing we know is in the tapes somewhere is Amber asking him if he had anything to do with Laci's disappearance, and his replying, "Yes...um...no, but I know who did..."
That's gonna be hard for his attorneys to explain.
To: Devil_Anse
I was hoping that would be exposed in the prelim.I read on the Websleuths forum today There's a timeline thread and a good legal thread..by Midnite..about the middle of the thread is a good start.
215
posted on
11/21/2003 4:12:55 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: MEG33
That's so funny, b/c just last night I, too, went and read the Websleuths timeline! It's good, isn't it?
One thing I wasn't sure about that was in their timeline was that at least 2 and maybe 4 people saw Scott at the Berkeley marina at about 12:00-12:15 p.m. on Dec. 24.
To: Devil_Anse
There was a lot of stuff I recall but don't where I read it.I know when Scott was caught it was said he had a passport in his brother's name.I searched and found one article that said he had a partially filled out passport application.
I don't believe this was mentioned at the prelim. I know I heard about the witnesses to the boat launch..where ,I don't know.Crime News 2000 has a pretty good forum ,too.
217
posted on
11/21/2003 5:41:16 AM PST
by
MEG33
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200, 201-217 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson