Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/17/2003 4:28:52 PM PST by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RightWhale
ping

Thought you might be interested in this.
Of course, you already know that Spencer Abraham is gonna dictate that any new moon shuttles built by NASA must be powered only by zero-emission solar panels and hydrogen fuel cells.

2 posted on 11/17/2003 4:31:47 PM PST by Willie Green (Go Pat Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
bump!
3 posted on 11/17/2003 4:33:12 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
The Chinese are also well aware of He3 and that is in their plan for moon exploration.
4 posted on 11/17/2003 4:33:22 PM PST by RightWhale (Close your tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: sourcery; Ernest_at_the_Beach
ping
5 posted on 11/17/2003 4:36:50 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
With the oil age starting to appear alarmingly finite, and with governments all over the planet searching for new energy sources, space scientists are looking at yet another fuel source, this one distributed on the moon over billions of years as birds distributed guano on the island of Nauru.

It started to appear alarmingly finite at the very beginning of its modern use as a fuel.
6 posted on 11/17/2003 4:37:56 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
What are the chances that environmentalists will allow strip-mining on the moon? Or is there a way to extract He3 from lunar soil without disturbing the soil?
7 posted on 11/17/2003 4:43:36 PM PST by AZLiberty (Where Arizona turns for dry humor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
One tonne, they say, could supply the energy needs of a city of 10 million people when combined in a fusion reactor with a form of hydrogen extracted from water.

Ooops. Exactly which fusion reactor is that now?

10 posted on 11/17/2003 4:47:40 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green

12 posted on 11/17/2003 5:07:33 PM PST by sourcery (No unauthorized parking allowed in sourcery's reserved space. Violators will be toad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
Nuclear fusion is the other source of energy, but faces lots of political problems because of the radioactive waste it produces and because it produces a great number of neurons, which damage reactors, cutting their life.

What????

17 posted on 11/17/2003 5:42:40 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Proud member - Neo-Conservative Power Vortex)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Willie Green
Ok, let me get this straight.

The author advocates using an untested fuel from the MOON (a place that we have not visited since the '70s), extract this via some undiscovered means, transport it by some unknown means back to earth. Process it somehow, ship it somehow and use it with a FUSION reactor (of which NONE exists) to boost power production.

Did I get this right?

Gosh, why don't we just go to the sun and extract some of the sun's surface, transport it back to earth and use it's energy.

[man, what is this guy smoking?]
23 posted on 11/18/2003 9:52:31 AM PST by taxcontrol (People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson