[PJ-Comix]

Notice how there is virtually NO reporting about this report in the lamestream press on the Saddam/Al Qaeda ties?

[Huck]

The public has no idea it exists.

[dead]

Williams: “I think the case is not to refute it. I think the case is to prove it, and it's yet to be proven.”

Tapes could emerge of Saddam and Osama slow-dancing naked in Macy’s window, and Juan Williams would still not see the love.

[gaspar]

By all means persue, report. However, there is a major error in the CIA report itself. Point 10 insinuates that there was a meeting of Iraqi principles and OBL at his farm ouside Khartoum in July 1996. That was an impossibility. OBL left the Sudan in mid-May, and was operating between Peshawar and Kandahar at the time.

[JohnGalt]

Its tough for other networks to take it seriously when the magazine that printed the leaked 'memo' and the network that first reported the story are not only owned by the same person.

And when Fred Barnes works for both organizations, it just looks hackey.

[Ann Archy]

Hey all...ask your liberal relatives and friends who watch the alphabet tv stations if they have heard this story.

[driftless]

Despite the mountain of smoke coming from that area, libs were desperately hoping that there was no fire. Come on, just about the whole lib argument against the war was hoping against hope (and logic) that there was no connection between Hussein and Al-Qaeda. Now there was already evidence that Hussein supported other terrorists, so why wouldn't he support Al-Qaeda? We were pals with Stalin during WWII and arch-enemies afterwards. Necessity makes strange bedfellows, and Saddam and Osama have been sharing sleeping quarters for some time. Hey libs, pull your pointy heads out of your hindquarters and smell the coffee.