To: PJ-Comix
Despite the mountain of smoke coming from that area, libs were desperately hoping that there was no fire. Come on, just about the whole lib argument against the war was hoping against hope (and logic) that there was no connection between Hussein and Al-Qaeda. Now there was already evidence that Hussein supported other terrorists, so why wouldn't he support Al-Qaeda? We were pals with Stalin during WWII and arch-enemies afterwards. Necessity makes strange bedfellows, and Saddam and Osama have been sharing sleeping quarters for some time. Hey libs, pull your pointy heads out of your hindquarters and smell the coffee.
23 posted on
11/17/2003 2:58:32 PM PST by
driftless
( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: driftless
Come on, just about the whole lib argument against the war was hoping against hope (and logic) that there was no connection between Hussein and Al-Qaeda. True. It's RIDICULOUS to think that Saddam had no connection with Al Qaeda. Both were dedicated to harming America. And the libs think Bin Laden wouldn't deal with Saddam because of religious problems? Gimme a break! Even Osama doesn't believe in that crap. Remember, he was a spoiled rich student brat in Britain. He is just using the religion shtick to attract ignorant Muslims. Osama would definitely have no problems dealing with Saddam. And we sure neither know had any moral qualms in dealing with each other.
24 posted on
11/17/2003 4:47:20 PM PST by
PJ-Comix
(Algore Invented Urine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson