To: pollywog; fiesti; nickcarraway; Pegita; JustPiper; FreepinforTerri; joesnuffy; NYer
One advocate for Schiavo's death, reacting to the reinsertion of her feeding tube, declared that it is "simply inhumane and barbaric to interrupt her death process." But Schiavo is not a dying patient. She simply doesn't function at the same level as the rest of us. . . There was no death process under way until her food and water were taken away. Trivia question: who had the audacity, the pomposity, to complain that we interrupted Terri's "death process"? As if she was a queen regally proceeding to an important event? As if we were total fools for wanting anything ELSE for her, the lucky woman?
6 posted on
11/17/2003 11:22:22 AM PST by
cyn
(http://www.terrisfight.org)
To: cyn
An Amen Bump!
11 posted on
11/17/2003 12:15:27 PM PST by
JustPiper
(All 19 of the hijackers entered the U.S. on valid visas- 18 of 19 had State Driver's Licenses!!!)
To: cyn
I don't know if this question is rhetorical or not but I'll answer anyway. :) It was none other than good old George Felos, Schiavo's euthanasia-supporting attorney, who writes in his book Litigation as Spiritual Practice that the soul of a PVS patient spoke to him telepathically, confirming to him her wish to die.
I rather suspect he was incensed that his enjoyment of Terri's death was interrupted.
15 posted on
11/17/2003 2:29:06 PM PST by
agrace
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson