[cyn]

One advocate for Schiavo's death, reacting to the reinsertion of her feeding tube, declared that it is "simply inhumane and barbaric to interrupt her death process." But Schiavo is not a dying patient. She simply doesn't function at the same level as the rest of us. . . There was no death process under way until her food and water were taken away.

Trivia question: who had the audacity, the pomposity, to complain that we interrupted Terri's "death process"? As if she was a queen regally proceeding to an important event? As if we were total fools for wanting anything ELSE for her, the lucky woman?

[JustPiper]

An Amen Bump!

[agrace]

I don't know if this question is rhetorical or not but I'll answer anyway. :) It was none other than good old George Felos, Schiavo's euthanasia-supporting attorney, who writes in his book Litigation as Spiritual Practice that the soul of a PVS patient spoke to him telepathically, confirming to him her wish to die.

I rather suspect he was incensed that his enjoyment of Terri's death was interrupted.