To: jennyp
Personally, I think theism survives so tenaciously because it's much easier for most people Jenny, theism survives because it is more rational. It requires much more faith -- not reason -- to be an atheist than to believe in a creator.
And don't discount personal experience. Many, many people -- including me -- have felt the touch of God.
You can claim we are delusional -- albeit rationalizing why us have done rather significant things after this conversion. Or you can accept that there is something to it.
475 posted on
11/21/2003 8:47:14 AM PST by
Tribune7
(It's not like he let his secretary drown in his car or something.)
To: Tribune7
It requires much more faith -- not reason -- to be an atheist than to believe in a creator.
Justify this statement.
Many, many people -- including me -- have felt the touch of God.
I can get similar stories from many Hindus. I don't know why I should believe you and not them.
478 posted on
11/21/2003 10:14:51 AM PST by
Dimensio
(The only thing you feel when you take a human life is recoil. -- Frank "Earl" Jones)
To: Tribune7; jennyp; betty boop; Phaedrus
Er, if you don't mind, I'd like to add my "me, too" to your statement:
Many, many people -- including me -- have felt the touch of God.
I also agree that Christian faith is most rational! IMHO, the metaphysical naturalist (atheist) claim to being rational rests on the worldview that: "all that there is" is all that exists in nature.
That worldview is not shared by many (if not most) physicists and mathematicians - the most epistemologically zealous of all the disciplines. It is also not shared by most philosophers and the general public.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson