Which is more arrogant of man?
Religion, that claims the creator of the entire universe takes a personal interest in YOUR life, that claims the universe is structured to provide for man's eternal salvation if man so choses it, that claims man can have a personal relationship with God?
Or athiesm, that claims that man is a infinitely small piece of a huge uncaring universe. That man is nothing more than a temporary collection of cells with a finite existence?
Belief in religion requires a much larger ego and is a much greater statement of arrogance on the part of mankind.
Atheism, that claims that man's creator doesn't exist. That it's not the Creator who was self-existant, but rather man himself who is self-existant, if only by random chance.
Or Christianity, that recognizes that man does owe his existence to the Creator. That the Creator does have rights to demand a certain level of responsibility and caring from His creation. That we as the creation have failed to live up to that standard that the Creator sets for us, but not because we were created imperfectly but rather because we were given free choice and chose to rebel. And that we are incapable of saving ourselves and need a savior.
Which indeed?
PS not all religions claim that God takes a personal interest in YOUR life. Many, probably most, teach that God is impersonal. Christianity teaches that God is very personal.
And while that might sound arrogant to believe that the creator of the universe takes a personal interest in you. Imagine the affront of having Your creation decide that You don't even exist, that they don't need You, that You're not relevant, that You didn't do all the things history records that You did, rather other parts of Your creation just made them up.
Not to mention the amazing luck to be born in the exact time and place to receive the correct religion and one and only correct interpretation of the Bible.
"Religion" covers a lot of territory, Doc. Do you have a particular religion in mind? And what does the foregoing have to do with arrogance?
Or athiesm, that claims that man is a infinitely small piece of a huge uncaring universe. That man is nothing more than a temporary collection of cells with a finite existence?
Problem is that atheism has no scientific or rational basis for these claims. We live in an orderly and beautiful universe and it is not rational to claim that this "just happened".
Belief in religion requires a much larger ego and is a much greater statement of arrogance on the part of mankind.
Well, nonsense.