Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Detective: Laci Peterson's body dressed in tan pants, contradicting
SFChronicle.com ^ | 11/14/2003 | Brian Melley

Posted on 11/17/2003 5:38:18 AM PST by runningbear

Detective: Laci Peterson's body dressed in tan pants, contradicting husband's account

Detective: Laci Peterson's body dressed in tan pants, contradicting husband's account

BRIAN MELLEY, Associated Press Writer Friday, November 14, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(11-14) 12:31 PST MODESTO, Calif. (AP) --

A police detective acknowleged Friday that he didn't follow up on a tip from a woman who claimed to have seen someone resembling Laci Peterson in a park on the day her husband says she disappeared.

Under cross-examination by attorneys for Scott Peterson, Detective Philip Owen said he didn't pursue the tip because he didn't think it was "going in the right direction."

Peterson's attorneys have suggested during the preliminary hearing, in its ninth day Friday, that detectives zeroed in on Laci Peterson's husband as a suspect, and ignored other leads.

Owen said he didn't feel the woman's tip was credible because it conflicted with other information detectives had received.

The woman, an employee at the Stanislaus County Hospital, told police she saw a woman who resembled Laci Peterson walking a barking golden retriever in the park near the Peterson home at around 10:45 a.m. on Dec. 24. The tipster reported that two men walking near the woman told her to shut the dog up.

On Thursday, Karen Servas, who lived near the couple, testified that she found Laci Peterson's golden retriever wandering in the street at "approximately 10:18 a.m."

Scott Peterson told police that he last saw his wife, who was eight months pregnant, on the morning of Christmas Eve as he left to go fishing.

Laci Peterson's remains washed ashore in San Francisco Bay in April, just three miles from where her husband said he'd been fishing that day.

On Thursday, Owen said Laci Peterson's body was clad in tan pants -- not the black pants her husband reported she was wearing when he left on his fishing trip.

The pants matched a pair bought on Peterson's account at a Modesto maternity store, Owen said. Her half sister, Amy Rocha, testified she was wearing tan pants Dec. 23 -- the last time anyone other than her husband reported seeing her alive.

Prosecutors contend that Peterson killed his pregnant wife later that night or early the next morning and then dumped her body in San Francisco Bay.

Owen was the third policeman to take the stand in Stanislaus County Superior Court to determine whether the 31-year-old fertilizer salesman is tried on murder charges in the slayings of his wife and unborn son.

Detective Al Brocchini, the first detective on the case, wrapped up his third day of testimony Thursday, revealing more details about what led police to keep their focus on Peterson.

On three days in early January, undercover police officers trailed Peterson to the Berkeley Marina -- the place he said he launched his boat to go fishing........

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

'TEE' TWIST IN LACI-SLAY ALIBI

'TEE' TWIST IN LACI-SLAY ALIBI

By HOWARD BREUER

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 16, 2003 -- MODESTO, Calif. - Avid golfer Scott Peterson not only told his sister-in-law about his plans to play golf the day he allegedly murdered his pregnant wife and dumped her off his fishing boat - he had a reservation at the course that he never used, The Post has learned.

"He had a tee time of about 9 a.m. or 9:30 on Dec. 24, and he never called to cancel it. He just didn't show up," said an insider at the Del Rio Country Club, where Peterson bought a $25,000 membership months before Laci's Christmas Eve disappearance.

The club discreetly booted Peterson out after the public began to suspect he killed his wife.

"He was such an avid golfer," the insider said. "It seems unusual that he didn't show up. It seemed that something else intervened."

Although Peterson's preliminary hearing on double-murder charges enters its fourth week tomorrow, witnesses have so far offered no testimony that Peterson went so far as to book a tee time at his golf club.

In recent court testimony, witnesses testified that, when Scott reported Laci missing Christmas Eve, he told police that he had planned to play golf Dec. 24 but he decided that morning it was too cold so he went fishing by himself at the Berkeley Marina.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys are not allowed to discuss evidence with the media because of a gag order. Officials at the upscale country club have repeatedly refused to discuss Peterson.

On Dec. 23 - the last time family members saw Laci Peterson alive - Scott told sister-in-law Amy Rocha that he planned to play golf the following day.

University of Washington law professor Lis Wiehl........

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SCOTT SIGNALS AMBER ALERT

By HOWARD BREUER

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 15, 2003 -- MODESTO, Calif. - Scott Peterson's defense may subpoena his former mistress Amber Frey in a bold gamble to put the prosecution's ace witness on the stand early, lawyers close to the case said yesterday. It became clear last week that the prosecution would not call Frey as a witness during Peterson's preliminary hearing on charges that he murdered wife Laci Peterson and their unborn son Connor. That hearing is now in its second week.

But when Peterson is eventually tried, Frey could supply damaging testimony about her extramarital fling with Peterson, and provide crucial motive evidence.

Defense lawyer Mark Geragos refused to confirm or deny a report by the Fox News Channel that he's issued a subpoena for the blond massage therapist. But the lawyer said yesterday he has the right to make Frey testify.

"If I want her, they [prosecutors] have to produce her," Geragos told The Post.

A legal analyst said the defense could benefit from the unconventional move.

"Up to now, it's always been believed she'd be damaging to the defense, but maybe Geragos has something on her - he was clearly upset when the prosecution said they weren't going to be calling her," said Fox News Channel legal editor Stan Goldman, a law professor at Loyola Marymount University in Los Angeles.

"I spoke to Mr. Geragos and he told me no final decision has been made," said Gloria Allred, Frey's lawyer. "There will be no decision on that until at least Monday.

Even then, she added, "the defense will still have to show .......

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Judge may accept DNA evidence

Judge may accept DNA evidence

Last Updated: November 14, 2003, 03:41:00 PM PST

3:37 p.m., PST: Judge Al Girolami is leaning toward allowing mitochondrial DNA evidence in Scott Peterson’s ongoing preliminary hearing, the judge said this afternoon.

But he agreed to hear one last argument from each side. Girolami did not say if he intends to issue a ruling when court adjourns for the day at about 4 p.m.

A subhearing on mitchondrial DNA testing has been woven into the larger preliminary hearing since it began Oct. 29. The Peterson proceeding is breaking new ground because mitochondrial DNA analysis has never before been used for forensic evidence in California courts.

Two FBI experts have testified that such testing is accepted in the scientific community, while a defense expert said it is unreliable and vulnerable to contamination.

The issue is important to both sides of the Peterson case. A prosecution theory relies on a test showing that a hair found in Peterson’s boat could have come from his pregnant wife; authorities say the defendant could have used the boat to transport his wife’s body.

Peterson is charged with murdering Laci Peterson and their unborn son, who was to be named Conner.

Girolami, however, said he has “issues” with the relatively small database used by the FBI for mitochondrial DNA analysis. It has only 5,071 samples, with only 1,833 from Caucasians.

Also this afternoon, defense attorney Mark Geragos appeared to suggest that a hair from Laci Peterson could have attached to a tracking dog in her home, then fell off in the boat when officers asked the dog to try picking up the missing woman’s scent.

The hair has taken center stage of a legal battle, with disputes over whether it broke in two while in police custody or whether another hair was introduced into the original sample.

Rodney Oswalt, a state Department of Justice criminalist, acknowledged under questioning by Geragos that he did not conclude that two fragments were parts of the same hair.........

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Superior Court, Stanislaus County
November 14, 2003

Minute Order: Preliminary Hearing
(ie; Tenth day court provided overview)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Officer tried to trap Peterson Detective testifies that he prodded suspect's friends, mistress for clues.

Officer tried to trap Peterson Detective testifies that he prodded suspect's friends, mistress for clues.

Bee News Services
(Published Thursday, November 13, 2003, 9:40 AM)

MODESTO -- A detective who spent Christmas Eve questioning Scott Peterson and the next four months trying to find his missing pregnant wife testified Wednesday about how officers enlisted Peterson's friends, neighbors and mistress in the effort to snare him.

Detective Al Brocchini said he called friends of Scott and Laci Peterson to point out news articles about his extramarital affair and a $250,000 insurance policy Peterson took out on his wife. The insurance policy information later turned out to be inaccurate.

The officer said he asked neighbors to provide tips and tried to get friends to prod Scott Peterson for details about what happened to his wife.

The remains of the 27-year-old substitute teacher and her unborn son washed ashore in San Francisco Bay in April only a few miles from where Peterson said he was fishing Christmas Eve when she vanished.

At one point, Brocchini made a note that he "was attempting to plant the seeds of suspicion" in the mind of a friend of Laci Peterson's.

The testimony came as the defense continued cross-examining Brocchini, the first detective to investigate the disappearance of the pregnant woman. The defense has claimed investigators focused suspicion on Peterson and failed to catch the "real killers."

Defense lawyer Mark Geragos also renewed his claim Wednesday that investigators neglected to notify him of surveillance tapes of the Peterson home. He called the failure "a problem of monumental proportions" and said it could lead to a request to dismiss the case.

Brocchini said he took part in discussions with other officers about themes that mistress Amber Frey should discuss with Peterson to coax a confession from him during phone calls she was secretly recording.

Brocchini said he gave Frey a tape recorder Dec. 30 and bought equipment at a Radio Shack store to help with her taping. Investigators hoped Peterson would not realize she was cooperating with them, the detective said.

Laci Peterson's mother and brother, Sharon and Brent Rocha, also ......

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-254 last
To: Devil_Anse
Dev I read the transcript where Geragoose was doing his baby swimming "like this" routine and the Pathologist said he doubted it or it wouldn't be his first thought. Something like that. In any event, I thought his final statement deflated Geragroos sufficiently!!
241 posted on 11/18/2003 1:45:20 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras
"If it's to cold to play golf it's to cold to sit in a boat on a windy bay." Disagreeing here. There's no such thing as a bad day fishing.

I agree for many that is true, I am an avid golfer as the article stated peterson is. I quit playing golf at the 32 degree mark and stop fishing around sweater weather.
But that's just me, peterson has many times been described as an avid golfer and someone that only fished once in awhile.
I know he bought a boat but his wife didn't even know he owned it. So I stand by my statement that if it's to cold to play golf then who would drive a farily long way to sit and fish on a cold windy bay all by themselves.

242 posted on 11/18/2003 2:16:00 PM PST by LittleRedRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
Maybe we should plan some sacrifices during the winter just to be sure??? Oh, wait----

Pinz
243 posted on 11/18/2003 2:29:17 PM PST by pinz-n-needlez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: drjulie; Devil_Anse; Velveeta; Jackie-O; All
This is disturbing to me...

"...two weeks before Laci Peterson disappeared, Frey confronted Peterson about whether he was married. Peterson drove to Fresno and, holding Frey's hand and crying, told her that he had lost his wife and was facing his first Christmas alone, Buehler testified."

Scott's crying and handholding on 12/9 for a woman he just met on 11/20. and yet he can hardly squeeze out a tear for his wife and son? What is that about? How is this explained by 'our' supposed/speculation dx of Scott?

Had Scott already dismissed Laci and his unborn son from his mind by 11/20? If so he was ready to jump right into something else and get far away.

But did his dismissal of Laci from his mind begin after she became pregnant or after he met Amber? Remember he was looking for romantic hook-up's as early as October that we know of at this point.

I think the pregnancy was Laci's death knell. Scott knew she might not conceive easily or at all. By the time she finally did get pregnant and announced it to everyone I think he was in a panic mode, possibly setting off delusional thinking?

DrJulie??? Or was it just the sociopathic tendency to attack when backed into what they think is the FINAL corner.

He'd figured after two years of trying to get 'her' pregnant he was home free. Not to mention the marital problems associated with going for infertility tx's.

No rug rats for him! Just the little woman, who apparently didn't know his true character, or decided to ignore his flaws. He was set...until that miracle of conception occured.

I'd like to know if anyone saw any changes in his behavior (besides trolling for babes as early as October) since the pregnancy was announced. All that sex addict stuff sounds like more of Geragos' smelly red herrings.

Anyway....later in the same article is the reason why he hadn't told her himself, before she found out on her own that he was married:

"In a call from Jan. 6, Peterson told his mistress he was "longing to hold on to you."

Laci Peterson Disappearance

244 posted on 11/18/2003 4:25:29 PM PST by hergus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: runningbear; Sandylapper; MaggieMay; Velveeta; Jackie-O; Rheo; alexandria; drjulie; Devil_Anse; ...
This lament was written and posted by me in May 2003, thought it might be appropriate to post at this time.


BABY CONNOR’S LAMENT
By: STOCKHRSE

Will Laci & Baby Connor Peterson’s desecrated existence be another extravagance in the gender war dividing American men and women? Millions are being slaughtered under the guise of Abortion Rights in this Genocide perpetuated by the Liberal factions of this country. Under the daylight of sound reason, and the constitution, which rules the parameters of acceptable legislation, another interpretation emerges. Little Connor's legacy may be that of hero, whose message is accepted by clear thinking people, who then stop the useless murder of fetuses. This message is intuitive, in that Connor was a Fetus; a human being in this stage, speech and sight challenged.
In “ Womb” There Is Concern:
"Hi...I was Connor Peterson, a Fetus like any other Fetus and a great experience it was. I was a human, the epitome of creation, but I may be a little biased. I was spending the required time to develop from embryo just as you and every human had to do.
My LIFE was taken from me by an act of homicide on Mom and me, and I must accept that. I could not see my Killer, because I would not reach my sight development for a time yet.
I have no anger toward my murderer, because anger is not known where I am now, but remember the concept from my womb experience as it was cramped at times. I understand the anger felt by those who wanted to hold me close, as well as those who just respected my right to be born, like all other Fetuses young and old.
I do not know what happens in your world, to people who do these things to the little people, but I hope that in your wisdom you get them all. There are so many here with me, so young they did not experience all the great things I experienced from my wonderful womb development, and they never will. They know how great it was, just as I know how great your life is, but they will never know the enjoyment of my experience, the same, as I will never experience the enjoyment of yours. What a waste, and a terrible injustice; don't you think so?
Well at least we do not know anger, thank God for that.... OUR killers evidently did not care".
Wish I were there!
Connor
That is all right Connor, there are many fully developed humans with sight, so blind that they will not see what is so clear. Murder of a Fetus is Murder of a Fetus whenever done to "wombever". It seems so clear, or is it just me? Lets straighten it up before we screw it up more. Equal treatment under the law, the same fate for all Fetus murderers.)
The message contains so much wisdom( if this Poster may be so "BRASS") the question now becomes: Was this the message of Connor through this Poster or were we both simply instruments of delivery.(Ray definitely thinks the latter but can't imagine why he was chosen...How does it go..."through the least of mine...."...Moi the least? .I think HE sent me a message also!(:)..).....;-0)
Ray : STOCKHRSE


245 posted on 11/18/2003 5:14:45 PM PST by STOCKHRSE ( The preceding is this Freeper's opinion and is submitted rhetorically. .........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hergus
I hear you Hergus. Who knows what made him twist? Narcissist....certainly. Sociopath.....most likely.

I don't understand why Amber's daughter would have been acceptable to him, but his own son was not welcome.

Sadly, I don't think we'll ever really know why.
246 posted on 11/18/2003 5:46:20 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: STOCKHRSE
Thanks Ray. It put a lump in my throat the first time I read it and again today.
247 posted on 11/18/2003 5:48:50 PM PST by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
"I don't understand why Amber's daughter would have been acceptable to him, but his own son was not welcome."

JMO, but that's exactly who the child was to Scott, AMBER's daughter. I bet in their month together Amber's family did a lot of babysitting, so to Scott that meant that Amber wouldn't encumber (sp?) him with her child as much as one of his own would.

It's not like it was his kid, he'd never be responsible for her child. IT would just be something else he could ignore without upsetting himself.

He never would haved stayed with Amber,IMO. I wonder now if this fast paced, head over heels in love thing Scott has going on was a pattern?

What's the label that has this symptomology in it? The guy that loves you completely within too short a length of time....I'm drawing a blank.

248 posted on 11/18/2003 10:46:44 PM PST by hergus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: hergus
Reviewing the phone calls: Scott called Jackie Peterson's shop not once but twice and talked about 3 minutes each time. That was about 2:40. Wonder what that conversation was about.

That was AFTER he got no answer at home. You would thing he would have called Laci's mother not his own.

It sounds like Laci was pretty much a stay at home person.

And now I'm thinking about the dog. Neighbors saw Scott and Laci, hand in hand walking the dog occasionally but no one has said that Laci usually walked the dog. Seems Scott jogged with the dog and continued that pattern after Laci died. I think we have the impression that the dog was closer to Laci but I now think HE/SHE? WAS TRAINED by Scott and that's why Scott could control the dog during whatever happened to Laci.

249 posted on 11/19/2003 9:24:32 AM PST by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: alexandria
Im still in Modesto, but the event would be Dec 20th... ;o) Ponderosa.... heehee...
250 posted on 11/19/2003 10:21:21 AM PST by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Im still in Modesto, but the event would be Dec 20th... ;o) Ponderosa.... heehee...

Meaning the bachlorette party event , or THE event? Wait Ponderosa as in the Ponderosa Ranch? That is the cutest little church up there. Do they still drive you off in a horse drawn carridge after the ceremony?

251 posted on 11/19/2003 7:18:05 PM PST by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies]

To: alexandria
not sure on the horse and buggy. Yes, it is the Ponderosa Ranch. I have never been there, but saw it this past October and looked it up on the web, and that is where they filmed Bonanza? Maybe the 'event' there, or Reno Hilton.. Time is going by fast now... only 30 days away! ;o) Planning for a Nevada wedding, not Califa!
252 posted on 11/20/2003 5:51:50 AM PST by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
The little church at the Ponderosa is absolutly darling and yes, they used to have the added "perk" of the couple leaving in a decorated horse and carridge type thing for pictures. I can't exactly remember where they take you but it wasn't too far. Then they drop you with the rest of your party (if any).
My mom always wanted me to get married there. I told her she was just trying to get out of paying for the evening candlelight ceremony at the World Church (in L.A.) that I had planned. <:o)
253 posted on 11/20/2003 2:49:51 PM PST by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: alexandria
LOL... Unfortunately, I looked on the web page for them, and they are closed since mid October for the winter season. ;o)

So, it is Reno Hilton package, being booked today.

I am beginning to feel like 30 days is 2 days from now....lol...

254 posted on 11/21/2003 5:11:03 AM PST by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-254 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson