[steplock]

The Federal Court had NO JURISDICTION in this matter of a STATE Judge in a STATE court.

THAT is why he refused to follow their ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL demands.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

The Federal courts would have to prove that Moore went above and beyond what previous members of government had done to prove that he was, in fact, elevating one specific religion above all others. What he did was nothing unusual by the standards of previous members of government. They know that. They are the ones seeking to establish a religion, the worship of law. And it seems to me that the worship of law is deeply rooted in people who do not even realise what has happened to them. They must be awakened.

[Servant of the 9]

The Federal Court had NO JURISDICTION in this matter of a STATE Judge in a STATE court.

THAT is why he refused to follow their ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL demands.

First of all, a Federal Judge does have jurisdiction over violations of the First Ammendment, by anyone anywhere in this nation.

Second of all, the proper course is to appeal the decision, not defy it.

So9

[debj]

Thank God for intelligent people like yourself, taking the time to post the true facts. You would think that anyone who wanted to talk about a subject would at least get their facts first before sounding off and causing themselves to look foolish. This Judge has the backbone and integrity to take such a stand as this and I for one am praying that he prevails.