Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brian Haig: Gen. Boykin Is a Hero, Not a Villain
NewsMax ^ | 11/15/03 | Brian Eberhart

Posted on 11/14/2003 2:29:42 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2003 2:29:44 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I was disappointed to hear Stormin Norman's opinion of Lt. Gen. Boykin and what should be done to him becuase of his remarks.
2 posted on 11/14/2003 2:33:56 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
He is without reservation a hero to me and my family. If only our elected officials would grow such 'nads.
3 posted on 11/14/2003 2:36:44 PM PST by realpatriot (Tagline moved to chat-admin moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
I must have missed what Stormin Norman said. Got a link?

L

4 posted on 11/14/2003 2:39:01 PM PST by Lurker (Some people say you shouldn't kick a man when he's down. I say there's no better time to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Lt. Gen. William G. Boykin didn't go out preaching in a Saudi streetcorner; he spoke in a Christian church. And the "extreme" statement he made was unexceptional Christianity, and not even explicitly anti-muslim.

The speech became public, and aroused protests which "break my heart," only because a journalist wanted that result and went out to create that result.

Anyone who is surprised that a journalist would undercut the First Amendment in such a way doesn't understand the difference between the journalism establishment and "the press".

5 posted on 11/14/2003 2:42:20 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The everyday blessings of God are great--they just don't make "good copy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Why does it seem to largely escape notice that Islam, like Marxist/Leninism seeks to control the whole world? Whether by Fabian or Baader-Meinhoff methods, socialism sought power by conversion and/or conquest. It boggles the mind that we have allowed free access to all levels of government by those who would replace all our institutions if they could.

Wait a minute, it slipped my mind for a moment. We have allowed socialists to take control of many of our institutions. Perhaps there is common cause here between Islam and socialism.

6 posted on 11/14/2003 2:43:27 PM PST by yatros from flatwater (The Constitution is dead. Long live the Articles of Confederation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
"I must have missed what Stormin Norman said. Got a link?"

No sir/mam, afraid I don't. I saw him in a TV interview a week or two ago. Probably on FNC but I can't recall exactly which channel. The short & skinny of it was that he did not like the comments AT ALL. He thought that Gen. Boykin should be relieved of duty. I saw flashes of liberalism in him during that interview but I have no idea what his political leanings might be.
7 posted on 11/14/2003 2:47:12 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Who cares what their politics are as long as they are steadfast in killing our enemies and crushing their will to fight or support those who do.

Just more anti-pluralist PC crap from many who haven't risked squat.

We are our own worst enemies.
8 posted on 11/14/2003 2:48:04 PM PST by wardaddy (we must crush our enemies and make them fear us and sap their will to fight....all 2 billion of them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
That's too bad...he's always had flashes of politics in him I guess or he would have never gotten that second star.
9 posted on 11/14/2003 2:49:21 PM PST by wardaddy (we must crush our enemies and make them fear us and sap their will to fight....all 2 billion of them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Boykin is right.
10 posted on 11/14/2003 2:52:45 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Boykin's enemies on the left and in the press (is that redundant?) hate him because he's a patriotic and effective American warrior, not in spite of it. His public utterance of the un-pc truth is the pretext they've seized on to destroy him. Conceding their premises and knuckling under to their phony protests is exactly the wrong message to send to the enemy.
11 posted on 11/14/2003 3:03:10 PM PST by Argus ((Ninety-nine and forty-four one-hundredths percent Pure Reactionary))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Thanks anyway, and I'm pretty sure I should be calling you 'sir'. I never got past LCPL.

My sex however, is decidedly male.

Semper Fi.

L

12 posted on 11/14/2003 3:30:40 PM PST by Lurker (Some people say you shouldn't kick a man when he's down. I say there's no better time to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Roger that. Semper Fi bro.
13 posted on 11/14/2003 3:33:19 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Boykin, who now leads the vital search for Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein

No wonder Satan, in all his forms, seeks his destruction.

14 posted on 11/14/2003 4:08:22 PM PST by prov1813man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
He thought that Gen. Boykin should be relieved of duty.

Hmm. Maybe Stormin Norman doesn't like the Snake Eater types? It's like that with a lot of officers from what I understand.

15 posted on 11/14/2003 6:22:17 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
I take it that your "snake eater" comment is some kind of insult for people of faith.

"It's like that with a lot of officers from what I understand."

I take it that you don't understand much then.
16 posted on 11/14/2003 6:30:30 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Snake Eater is a reference to Special Forces types. This is a moniker they have been tagged with over time. It has less than zero to do with religion.

Perhaps if you didn't know that I would suggest you were the one who didn't understand much?

17 posted on 11/14/2003 6:43:20 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Snake Eaters:


18 posted on 11/14/2003 6:49:27 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
"Snake Eater is a reference to Special Forces types..."

Right. I was thinking of snake handlers. I misunderstood. Sorry 'bout that.
19 posted on 11/14/2003 6:49:52 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
No problem ;-)
20 posted on 11/14/2003 6:54:06 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson