Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brian Haig: Gen. Boykin Is a Hero, Not a Villain
NewsMax ^ | 11/15/03 | Brian Eberhart

Posted on 11/14/2003 2:29:42 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Retired Army lieutenant colonel, popular author of “Private Sector” and news commentator Brian Haig tells NewsMax that the pillorying and investigation of beleaguered Lt. Gen. William G. Boykin is “a waste of time” as well as a tragic fate for one of the country’s greatest living warriors. Several Islamic and other groups criticized Boykin, the deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence, last month when reports surfaced of comments he made during speeches at evangelical Christian churches. Among other things, Boykin said the enemy in the war on terrorism was Satan and that God had put President Bush in the White House. He referred to one Muslim Somali warlord as an idol-worshipper.

Boykin’s remarks are under investigation at his own request by either the Army or DoD Inspector General’s Office; the record is unclear on this detail.

Brian Haig, son of retired Gen. Alexander Haig, the former secretary of state and supreme commander of NATO, worked with Boykin on the Joint Staff and feels strongly that he needs to be humanized.

Whenever he can, Haig tells NewsMax, he publicly decries the New York Times and Los Angeles Times for calling for Boykin’s head without any semblance of due process.

“Someone who knows and has served with General Boykin and can vouch for his character and extraordinary record of service needs to be heard,” says Haig.

The former strategic war planner for Korea and the man who helped design the vaunted Central Command refers to Boykin affectionately as “Snuffy” and is brim full of anecdotes about Boykin’s “extraordinary military history.”

That extraordinary history began in 1971 when Boykin was commissioned. Since then the warrior has been present for and knee deep in his country’s messiest battles.

Boykin, who now leads the vital search for Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein, emerged from the Vietnam era as a central figure in Delta Force, recalls Haig. Delta Force is the elite branch of special operations, and Boykin served with it in various capacities, including commander, from 1978 to 1990.

In 1980 Boykin was indeed in the thick of things: serving as the Delta Force operations officers on the Iranian hostage rescue attempt known as “Operation Eagle Claw.”

By 1983 the fighting soldier was leading the assault on the prison in Grenada, receiving grievous wounds. “Many of us never thought he would recover,” confesses Haig.

By 1989 he was storming through Noriega’s Panama searching for the criminal leader of that country.

In 1992 Col. Boykin was commanding the initial eight-man Delta team sent to Colombia to hunt down drug cartel leader Pablo Escobar. Unfortunately, says Haig, Boykin was subsequently dangerously and unlawfully “outed” as one of the key Escobar fighters.

In 1993 Boykin was again wounded by an incoming mortar round while commanding the infamous and bloody raid in Mogadishu, Somalia to capture clan leaders of warlord Mohamed Farrah Aidid.

Add to that Boykin’s service in Gulf War One and Two and the operations in Haiti, and it is fair to say that he has been serving at the point of the spear for decades.

Haig shakes his head when he reflects that all that service resulted in a summary “Just fire him.”

Haig laments that Boykin’s words were “taken out of context” and that at all times the general was not indicting a religion but rather a “wing of fanatics.”

Haig admits that indeed there is a semantic issue with American officials who choose to stand clear of any references to a religious war. At the same time, however, it is abundantly clear to the initiated that Islamic fanaticism motivates our terrorist foes.

In the meantime, Haig fervently hopes that the investigation and the other pressures put to bear on Boykin don’t “restrict his value” to the war on terrorism.

Haig says Boykin is an intensely religious man who does frame things in terms of good and evil. However, the niceties of political correctness should not rob the county of one of its heroes and a vital asset.



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: boykin; haig; williamboykin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2003 2:29:44 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I was disappointed to hear Stormin Norman's opinion of Lt. Gen. Boykin and what should be done to him becuase of his remarks.
2 posted on 11/14/2003 2:33:56 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
He is without reservation a hero to me and my family. If only our elected officials would grow such 'nads.
3 posted on 11/14/2003 2:36:44 PM PST by realpatriot (Tagline moved to chat-admin moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
I must have missed what Stormin Norman said. Got a link?

L

4 posted on 11/14/2003 2:39:01 PM PST by Lurker (Some people say you shouldn't kick a man when he's down. I say there's no better time to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Lt. Gen. William G. Boykin didn't go out preaching in a Saudi streetcorner; he spoke in a Christian church. And the "extreme" statement he made was unexceptional Christianity, and not even explicitly anti-muslim.

The speech became public, and aroused protests which "break my heart," only because a journalist wanted that result and went out to create that result.

Anyone who is surprised that a journalist would undercut the First Amendment in such a way doesn't understand the difference between the journalism establishment and "the press".

5 posted on 11/14/2003 2:42:20 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The everyday blessings of God are great--they just don't make "good copy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Why does it seem to largely escape notice that Islam, like Marxist/Leninism seeks to control the whole world? Whether by Fabian or Baader-Meinhoff methods, socialism sought power by conversion and/or conquest. It boggles the mind that we have allowed free access to all levels of government by those who would replace all our institutions if they could.

Wait a minute, it slipped my mind for a moment. We have allowed socialists to take control of many of our institutions. Perhaps there is common cause here between Islam and socialism.

6 posted on 11/14/2003 2:43:27 PM PST by yatros from flatwater (The Constitution is dead. Long live the Articles of Confederation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
"I must have missed what Stormin Norman said. Got a link?"

No sir/mam, afraid I don't. I saw him in a TV interview a week or two ago. Probably on FNC but I can't recall exactly which channel. The short & skinny of it was that he did not like the comments AT ALL. He thought that Gen. Boykin should be relieved of duty. I saw flashes of liberalism in him during that interview but I have no idea what his political leanings might be.
7 posted on 11/14/2003 2:47:12 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Who cares what their politics are as long as they are steadfast in killing our enemies and crushing their will to fight or support those who do.

Just more anti-pluralist PC crap from many who haven't risked squat.

We are our own worst enemies.
8 posted on 11/14/2003 2:48:04 PM PST by wardaddy (we must crush our enemies and make them fear us and sap their will to fight....all 2 billion of them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
That's too bad...he's always had flashes of politics in him I guess or he would have never gotten that second star.
9 posted on 11/14/2003 2:49:21 PM PST by wardaddy (we must crush our enemies and make them fear us and sap their will to fight....all 2 billion of them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Boykin is right.
10 posted on 11/14/2003 2:52:45 PM PST by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Boykin's enemies on the left and in the press (is that redundant?) hate him because he's a patriotic and effective American warrior, not in spite of it. His public utterance of the un-pc truth is the pretext they've seized on to destroy him. Conceding their premises and knuckling under to their phony protests is exactly the wrong message to send to the enemy.
11 posted on 11/14/2003 3:03:10 PM PST by Argus ((Ninety-nine and forty-four one-hundredths percent Pure Reactionary))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Thanks anyway, and I'm pretty sure I should be calling you 'sir'. I never got past LCPL.

My sex however, is decidedly male.

Semper Fi.

L

12 posted on 11/14/2003 3:30:40 PM PST by Lurker (Some people say you shouldn't kick a man when he's down. I say there's no better time to do it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Roger that. Semper Fi bro.
13 posted on 11/14/2003 3:33:19 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Boykin, who now leads the vital search for Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein

No wonder Satan, in all his forms, seeks his destruction.

14 posted on 11/14/2003 4:08:22 PM PST by prov1813man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
He thought that Gen. Boykin should be relieved of duty.

Hmm. Maybe Stormin Norman doesn't like the Snake Eater types? It's like that with a lot of officers from what I understand.

15 posted on 11/14/2003 6:22:17 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
I take it that your "snake eater" comment is some kind of insult for people of faith.

"It's like that with a lot of officers from what I understand."

I take it that you don't understand much then.
16 posted on 11/14/2003 6:30:30 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Snake Eater is a reference to Special Forces types. This is a moniker they have been tagged with over time. It has less than zero to do with religion.

Perhaps if you didn't know that I would suggest you were the one who didn't understand much?

17 posted on 11/14/2003 6:43:20 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Snake Eaters:


18 posted on 11/14/2003 6:49:27 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
"Snake Eater is a reference to Special Forces types..."

Right. I was thinking of snake handlers. I misunderstood. Sorry 'bout that.
19 posted on 11/14/2003 6:49:52 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
No problem ;-)
20 posted on 11/14/2003 6:54:06 PM PST by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson