Skip to comments.
A turf/power war is being waged between Deaniacs and
Clintonites
Jewish World Review ^
| 11/14/03
| Ryan Lizza
Posted on 11/14/2003 8:36:42 AM PST by DeFault User
The division in the party over Dean is less about ideology than about power. Three years after Bill Clinton left office, he and Hillary still control what remains of a Democratic establishment. Terry McAuliffe, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), was installed by Clinton.
--snip--
Dean, by contrast, has come to represent the party's anti-establishment forces. While the other candidates, especially former self-styled front-runner John Kerry, started the campaign by wooing party leaders, Dean built a grassroots army first--in part by bashing D.C. Democrats and their disastrous 2002 election strategy--and is only now leveraging his fund-raising power to win over establishment types. No Democrats closely associated with the Clintons are working for the Dean campaign. In fact, it's hard to find a Clintonite who speaks favorably of the former Vermont governor. This evident schism is not just about Dean's opposition to the war--or even his prospects in the general election. It's a turf war to decide who will control the future of the party.
--snip--
As the party's split into Deaniacs and anti-Dean Clintonites unfolds, one of the most intriguing subplots concerns the machinations of Gore. Immediately after the Florida recount was decided in 2000, Gore's senior aides were purged from the DNC and Clinton's were installed. Some ex-Gore staffers are still bitter about the coup, and several express admiration for what Dean is doing.
The two men have a strained history, but lately Gore is sounding more and more like Dean. His three most important speeches since leaving office have been harsh attacks on President Bush's Iraq policy and his abuse of the Patriot Act. The two most recent were delivered before MoveOn.org, the Internet network for grassroots liberals, which is overwhelmingly pro-Dean. Some suspect that, just as Dean went outside the Beltway and built his own high-tech grassroots army to bypass the sclerotic D.C. establishment, so is Gore. It's not a bad way for him to exercise influence in the party, if he wants to make a potential endorsement more powerful or if he still harbors hopes of running for president in 2008. "The rest of the Democratic infrastructure is controlled by the Clintons," says one top Democrat.
Perhaps Gore would not endorse the former Vermont governor (though Joe Trippi, Dean's campaign manager, says "they talk relatively regularly"). Regardless, he'll have to choose sides, because the Democrats are splitting into two parties: the party of Clinton, and the party of Dean.
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; clark; clinton; clintonistas; clintonites; dean; dnc; gore; powerstruggle; primaries
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
The cat herding isn't working.
To: DeFault User
The Clintons would sooner see the Democratic Party be destroyed than hand over control of it to the likes of Nikita Dean.
2
posted on
11/14/2003 8:43:27 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: DeFault User
Hehehehehehe!
To: DeFault User
After JIndal wins Sat in La...McAuliffe's days i the DNC are numbered...
4
posted on
11/14/2003 8:45:24 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: ken5050
McAuliffe's days i the DNC are numbered... I would like to believe that, except that Terry still signs all the checks. Anyone else would have been long gone by now. I think he sticks around until Hillary is done with him.
5
posted on
11/14/2003 8:49:12 AM PST
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: DeFault User
The GOP establishment learned the hard way in 1992 that voters vote on issues, not parties. The Clinton picked Democratic establishment is about to learn the same lesson the hard way.
6
posted on
11/14/2003 8:51:04 AM PST
by
bobjam
To: DeFault User
It's a turf war to decide who will control the future of the party. I hope it's a war of attrition. Long and bloody with numerous causalities.
7
posted on
11/14/2003 8:52:38 AM PST
by
Fzob
(Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
To: Pukin Dog
No way..he's now soon to be 0 for 4 in governor's races..and you haven't heard any talk about retaking the Senate...they'll need a fall guy..look at what Kerry's doing....McAwful has also been very low profile the last two weeks...hardly on the tube....it's a done deal...they're just trying to find a new captain for the Titanic...my thoughts, FWIW..if Breaux retires..Dona Brazile will run for his seat..that's why she hasn't signed up with any of the 9 Dem candidates....if he does run again...she'll take the DNC chair..
8
posted on
11/14/2003 8:54:03 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: goldstategop
One scenario would have the Dims in ruins and Hillary rushing to the rescue in 2008.
Not much in the article on Lieberman and Kerry who are caught in the midlle and can't please either side.
To: goldstategop
The Clintons would sooner see the Democratic Party be destroyed than hand over control of it to .......anyone.
10
posted on
11/14/2003 8:56:19 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
(ESPN now has 4 little wimpy sissies left. I'm switching back to FOX.)
To: goldstategop
William J Clinton is a secret Republican Party operative who had the objective of destroying the Democrat Party. He has been very successful so far, and will be awarded the Nation's highest honor by GWB when he finally comes in from the cold.
11
posted on
11/14/2003 8:57:38 AM PST
by
expatpat
To: ken5050
Dona Brazile will...take the DNC chair..No way -- the DNC is way too racist to allow a Black to take the top spot. Vice-chair, maybe.
12
posted on
11/14/2003 9:00:48 AM PST
by
expatpat
To: DeFault User
The split became very obvious when Susan Sarandon made that comment about hating Hillary.
A few months ago, the WSJ printed an op-ed by the Democrat Leadership Council, which said that the move to the far left would be disastrous for the Democrat party (and Hillary's hopes to win the presidency in 2008). They said that the extremism would cause a schism and spoil all the efforts of triangulation Clinton had performed to unite the various splinter groups of the party. Once these groups divide, they will not be easily rejoined.
13
posted on
11/14/2003 9:02:38 AM PST
by
Eva
To: ken5050
"she'll take the DNC chair."
Come on, after she helped engineer AlGore's defeat (along with the rest of the feminazis in Gore's inner circle).
To: Eva
.....when Susan Sarandon made that comment about hating HillaryDidn't hear that. Reference?
15
posted on
11/14/2003 9:07:39 AM PST
by
expatpat
To: webstersII; expatpat
we'll see..looks, she's a Dem trifecta..she covers all three of their constituencies..women, blacks,and gays..it was her get out the vote job at the last minute that kept Landrieu's seat in La...and she's seen as in no one's camp...she has her own constituency...she'd be perfect..rememberMcAulifee got the job when the Clintons pushed him in over the black guy..can't remember his name..he died last year..Brazile has been low profile..however, if, Breaux retires...she's running..and she'll be hard to beat..so the DNC chair is open..also, remember, the nominee gets to name his own person..so if Dean wraps it up by March..Terry's out anyway...
16
posted on
11/14/2003 9:07:50 AM PST
by
ken5050
To: goldstategop
17
posted on
11/14/2003 9:13:26 AM PST
by
BenLurkin
(Socialism is Slavery)
To: ken5050
The DNC fall guy is going to be non other than Howard Dean. They will say that Dean is scaring moderate Democrats into voting for Republicans. This is what you are going to be hearing soon from Kerry, Lieberman and Edwards. Clinton has already started suggesting that Democrats need to stay away from the hard left. They will claim that if Dean is the nominee (oh please) that Republicans will pick up a super majority in the Senate.
18
posted on
11/14/2003 9:14:32 AM PST
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: ken5050
How many blacks, gays, or even women have ever got top jobs in the DNC? None.
"the Clintons pushed him in over the black guy"
Point made
19
posted on
11/14/2003 9:17:08 AM PST
by
expatpat
To: Pukin Dog
Can't agree my friend..look , tomorrow the Dems are gonna lose their 4th consecutive gubernatoruial race...what has McAwful ever won..rememebr his boasts in 2002..?..he has zero credibility within the party..he's got to go..I believe, since he knows they're gonna lose in La..they've already worked out his departure.now the spin is being prepared..if, and I agree with your hope, that Dean is the nominee...then the real struggle will be the battle for control of the party between the Dean and Hillary forces...
20
posted on
11/14/2003 9:18:43 AM PST
by
ken5050
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson