To: hergus
I don't have a source, I'm no cataloger *g*, but I recall reading in the last week or so a quote from Brent saying that he was asked by the cops to suggest that there was a new policy on Laci. I was under the impression that's the article Brochini used in questioning the friend.
My understanding is that cops can say anything during investigations. It's fine if they lie, testing respondants' stories and assertions
Brochini has no obligation to correct newstories, or to give any real info to Scott or anyone else. I think Scott's behavior set off all of Brochini's bells on that first night.
They weren't going to put much energy into any other leads until they pinned down Scott, imo. I don't think they ever moved a step in attempting to clear Scott. We mostly thought he was guilty, based on his own words and behavior in those first months. I think it looks like the cops felt the same way, and then they found evidence to support their suspicions.
Pinz
(Sorry for getting carried away, Hergus, this isn't an attack, just got on a roll there. lol)
To: pinz-n-needlez
The sad part of this is that if the bodies hadn't surfaced, Scott probably would have gotten away with this and got the $250,000 besides.
Mother nature did him in.
371 posted on
11/17/2003 7:42:17 AM PST by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson