Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
You Posted:
"The deprivation of this right is immediate, ongoing and presumptively unconstitutional," Baird said from the bench. However, Baird said, the final determination of the constitutionality of the law will be made later after another hearing. It has not been scheduled.

The verdict first, then the trial?

My reply: Thi is so totally unbelievable. Ruling fist then trial?? What issssss it with Florida Judges? I don't get it?

Here in the Hinterlands I don't know it jsut seems like our judges are really "judges" . The Florida judges, one after another seem like they have an "agenda"? Is it jsut me?

Again if it is possible to re-call a Judge I WILL contribute money to a recall campaign. I would love to know if Judges can be re-called in Florida.
105 posted on 11/14/2003 11:14:09 AM PST by Lone Voice in the hinterlands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: Lone Voice in the hinterlands
>>"The deprivation of this right is immediate, ongoing and presumptively unconstitutional," Baird said from the bench. However, Baird said, the final determination of the constitutionality of the law will be made later after another hearing. It has not been scheduled.

>>The verdict first, then the trial?

You've got it!
THAT is ABSOLUTELY what they intend to do, and they have done it before! Remember a month ago? Same judges scheduled Terri's death sentence for Oct 15th, and scheduled her hearing for change of guardianship for 21 days later! (how conveeeeeeenient)
251 posted on 11/14/2003 3:42:38 PM PST by Future Useless Eater (Freedom_Loving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson