To: Abundy
We have already discussed privately owned ships which were armed with cannons. That does not change the fact that cannons were VERY expensive, rare and owned only by militias and perhaps SOME very RICH individuals. Though I have seen no evidence of privately owned artillery on the land. Got some?
You have missed most of the party so I guess it is too much to expect you would be on top of the discussion.
517 posted on
11/18/2003 10:15:58 AM PST by
justshutupandtakeit
(America's Enemies foreign and domestic agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
To: justshutupandtakeit
Up on the discussion...I think I've pegged you pretty well in the posts to you. I notice you haven't addressed my points - and I didn't expect you to.
BTW - It is perfectly legal now to own a cannon, but why should a pesky thing like reality hamper your attempts to defend your positions?
Have you figure out yet that true conservatives won't justshutupandtakeit, Mr. Clinton?
521 posted on
11/18/2003 10:27:42 AM PST by
Abundy
To: justshutupandtakeit
I should clarify - you have pretty much established that not only do you not understand the Second Amendment, you have serious issues with the First as well.
523 posted on
11/18/2003 10:29:19 AM PST by
Abundy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson