[Abundy]

Up on the discussion...I think I've pegged you pretty well in the posts to you. I notice you haven't addressed my points - and I didn't expect you to.

BTW - It is perfectly legal now to own a cannon, but why should a pesky thing like reality hamper your attempts to defend your positions?

Have you figure out yet that true conservatives won't justshutupandtakeit, Mr. Clinton?

[justshutupandtakeit]

Apparently you are under the false impression I either said cannons were illegal or should be. In actuality I merely said they are not covered under the 2d which clearly specifies "arms" not artillery. That is what started the whole cannon controversy in which my point has not been refuted.

Any point you have made has been addressed.