1 posted on
11/13/2003 9:21:53 AM PST by
VU4G10
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: VU4G10
I think it is time for a Christian Boycott..
2 posted on
11/13/2003 9:23:04 AM PST by
Porterville
(Grow some leather or go away.)
To: VU4G10
Wouldn't that just make them the British Red, then since the Cross is also a symbol of Christianity, just like Christ?
4 posted on
11/13/2003 9:24:51 AM PST by
xrp
To: VU4G10
And how
neutral is the Red Crescent?
All of them witches.
6 posted on
11/13/2003 9:25:27 AM PST by
Dr. Eckleburg
(There are very few shades of gray.)
To: VU4G10
How can the Red Cross, sporting a Christian symbol as both its name and logo, possibly exclude Jesus from the holiday celebrating his birth? Good question.
To: VU4G10
Time to change the symbol to a red crescent, or better yet, a red chicken!
8 posted on
11/13/2003 9:28:35 AM PST by
Gritty
To: VU4G10
Yes, the Red Cross should hide the identity of the religion that has aided so many the world over. Just how many Muslim soup kitchens do you see. How many Muslim charities do you see giving out coats and hats to Christians and Jews? Where are the Muslim foundations that hand out scholarships to needy Christian and Jewish children? Where are they?
9 posted on
11/13/2003 9:29:24 AM PST by
Lijahsbubbe
("I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers We are the president." -Hilary)
To: VU4G10
How profoundly stupid.
Have news for them too. They're Christmas cards, as in Christ. Get over it. If the fear is offending someone with a Christmas card - perhaps they shouldn't be sending it?!
To: VU4G10
Red
Cross bans Jesus - Bosses fearful of offending minority faiths
hmmm.....
12 posted on
11/13/2003 9:34:31 AM PST by
BSunday
(I'm not the bad guy)
To: VU4G10
14 posted on
11/13/2003 9:36:36 AM PST by
VU4G10
(Have You Forgotten?)
To: VU4G10
Is this the same Red Cross that has refused from day one to recognize Israel's
Magen David 'Adom (while recognizing the islamic Red Crescent and the Iranian Red Lion and Sun), and whose international founder was present at the First Zionist Congress in 1897 to see if the Jews were "plotting" something?
They'll probably change their symbol to a red dot or something before they'll recognize the Red Magen David.
15 posted on
11/13/2003 9:37:01 AM PST by
Zionist Conspirator
("Palaeoconservatives" are national relativists.)
To: VU4G10
Neutrality is as important on the high street as it is in Iraq.
I'm having a hard time understanding what exactly he means by this. Seems to met that neutrality on the streets of Iraq can get you killed, in which case proves the opposite of what he is attempting to prove.
18 posted on
11/13/2003 9:39:22 AM PST by
BSunday
(I'm not the bad guy)
To: VU4G10
"... instead of banning the three wise men, I would suggest the Red Cross employs one new one at the top. Bingo!
19 posted on
11/13/2003 9:39:49 AM PST by
talleyman
(Caviar emptor (a warning from the sturgeon general))
To: VU4G10
No more of my "artery juice" goes to them. I'm switching to Community Blood Center.
To: VU4G10
Okay. I have just banned the Red Cross.
They will get nothing more from me.
To: VU4G10
The Red Cross has seen my last penny.
Our local food bank did the same thing you know, two years ago they quit letting churches distribute their food because they did not want to be identified with any particular "religion".
Next thing I know their reps are on talk radio whining about folks not giving to the "needy" at the food bank anymore - I looked them up on internet after their local feed-the-poor-some-turkey benefit this year, found out they are affiliated with several radical, anti-american groups.
Might behoove us to find out who is trying to pull strings at the Red Cross now....
I do not give to any organization that affiliates or panders to anti-christian organizations.
25 posted on
11/13/2003 9:54:44 AM PST by
Roughneck
(9 out of 10 Terrorists prefer Democrats, the rest prefer Saddam Hussein)
To: VU4G10
Well well.... why don't they just call themselves the Red Crescent then?
26 posted on
11/13/2003 9:55:47 AM PST by
Rummyfan
To: VU4G10
They are going to take a big hit in their finances over this. The people who would be offended by Jesus, Christian themes or symbols are NOT the people who give money to them. It's the compassionate people who do. I can't recall any DemonRATS or other Liberals who support ANY compassionate giving. Since they have leaned to the left, let them collect from the left. I'll never give them another dime!!!!
27 posted on
11/13/2003 10:00:02 AM PST by
NRA2BFree
(ISLAM: The religion of peace, love, dismemberment and murder!)
To: VU4G10
This is idiotic.
28 posted on
11/13/2003 10:00:10 AM PST by
xzins
(Proud to be Army!)
To: VU4G10
....the three wise men Once again, the liberals prove they want nothing whatsoever to do with any wise men.
31 posted on
11/13/2003 10:03:48 AM PST by
Hillarys Gate Cult
("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
To: VU4G10
OK, let's do something effective here gang. Just stopping our own contributions to the Red Cross will do little. Let's see about making sure NONE of our tax dollars go to this odious organization. Many of their contributions come from government. Let's get that stopped and see if they still want Jesus banned from their organization.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson