Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: runningbear
When did Peterson tapes begin?

By GARTH STAPLEY and JOHN COTÉ
BEE STAFF WRITERS

http://www.modestobee.com/local/story/7730974p-8633208c.html
Last Updated: November 13, 2003, 06:43:47 AM PST


Scott Peterson's girlfriend may have secretly begun taping their telephone calls a week before his pregnant wife disappeared, a defense attorney suggested Wednesday in a courtroom revelation.
Fresno massage therapist Amber Frey previously said she began cooperating with police Dec. 30 after learning of Peterson's marital status in media reports about his wife, who was reported missing Christmas Eve.

Frey told Modesto police Detective Al Brocchini that she didn't tape her chats with Peterson before then, the detective testified Wednesday at Peterson's preliminary hearing on double-murder charges.

Modesto defense attorney Kirk McAllister suggested that was "a lie," and asked Brocchini if he had heard that Frey began recording Dec. 16. The detective said he had not.

Frey, 28, who has yet to testify, has said she didn't know Peterson was married when they met last Nov. 20. Brocchini testified last week that Peterson, now 31, told her about Dec. 9 that he had "lost his wife."

Brocchini said he gave Frey a tape recorder Dec. 30 and bought equipment at a Radio Shack store to help her with taping. Investigators hoped Peterson would not realize she was cooperating with them, the detective said.

"(Peterson) wasn't talking about Laci" in chats with Frey, Brocchini testified. "He was talking about himself," including a faked trip to Europe in late December, the detective said.

Authorities believe the fertil- izer salesman murdered his pregnant wife, Laci, Dec. 23 or 24. The bodies of mother and child were recovered in mid-April. Prosecutors are seeking the death pen- alty.

In another development Wednesday, authorities acknowledged having withheld from Peterson's defense camp three roughly one-hour recordings made by a surveillance camera mounted Jan. 3 on a pole across the street from his La Loma-area home.

Lead defense attorney Mark Geragos of Los Angeles called the lapse "a monumental problem" and referred to "a rogue element out there." But prosecutor Rick Distaso said tapes would be turned over to Geragos late Wednesday or early today, and Judge Al Girolami said he is satisfied with that promise.

"What we've got here is nothing better than a shell game in a capital case," Geragos fumed in frustration at having been denied the material. "The FBI is now saying, 'Go pound sand.'"

Agents from a local drug enforcement agency, who handle wiretaps and surveillance in Stanislaus County, installed the 8mm surveillance camera to monitor Peterson's movements from a nearby van, Distaso said. Brocchini said the camera alerted investigators, who could then follow Peterson.

The defense wants copies of the recordings in case they contain information that could exonerate Peterson, and shed light on a Jan. 18 burglary of his home by a neighbor.

Brocchini testified that he does not know whether the camera captured Kimberly Ann McGregor breaking into the Co-vena Avenue home. Sources have said she drank alcohol and took Laci Peterson's wedding dress, although it was later returned and no charges were filed.

Regarding taped phone conversations, Brocchini said he and other detectives coached Frey on what to say to Peterson. Responding to questions from McAllister, Brocchini acknowledged urging Frey to paint herself as a possible suspect, in the event that Peterson would admit guilt to deflect blame from her.

McAllister asked Brocchini about another tack, with Frey suggesting to Peterson that "maybe there was an accident, something happened and you (Peterson) panicked." The detective responded: "It could have happened. I don't remember it."

Laci Peterson's mother and brother, Sharon and Brent Rocha, also cooperated with authorities in their phone calls with Scott Peterson, Brocchini said.

A state Department of Justice officer sat in on some strategy meetings, Brocchini said. He said she is "not a psychologist," but he did not pin down her position and McAllister moved on.

Brocchini also acknowledged urging a friend of Peterson to read information in The Bee, regarding an insurance policy on Laci Peterson, that later turned out to be inaccurate. But the detective said he didn't know the information was false at the time.

"You were trying to poison his mind against Scott Peterson," McAllister charged.

A member of Laci Peterson's family had provided the information to The Bee, saying Scott Peterson had taken out a $250,000 policy on his wife in the summer of 2002. He actually had obtained the policy in June 2001, court documents show.

The inaccurate report was printed Jan. 17 -- the day before the burglary at Peterson's home.

Brocchini said he questioned as many friends of both Petersons as he could find. McAllister asked if Brocchini were willing to lie to them, but Girolami agreed with a prosecutor's objection and the detective did not answer.

Brocchini is expected to return to the witness stand today.

(snip)
27 posted on 11/13/2003 8:31:02 AM PST by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: All; maggiefluffs
From Article:"Modesto defense attorney Kirk McAllister suggested that was "a lie," and asked Brocchini if he had heard that Frey began recording Dec. 16. The detective said he had not."

I wonder why the defense attorney is trying to say that Amber started recording before Dec 30th when the police set it up?

Could it be that Scott's, lawyers, are trying to get her in trouble because it is against the law in Calif to tape people without their knowledge except for special circumstances.

30 posted on 11/13/2003 9:26:45 AM PST by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: maggiefluffs
Sorry that I am so behind here, but why would Amber have wanted to tape Scott's calls before distrusting him on the married issue? Didn't she even leave her small child alone with him at some point? Why do all that she did with him if she was so suspicious of him?

And what about her weirdness with the previous wife of a married man, going to see her baby in the hospital, throwing the wife (without the wife) a baby shower, and all that? Is that what Geragos wants to hit her over the head with now, on the stand, to disqualify her as a believable witness?

350 posted on 11/14/2003 1:50:41 PM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson