Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cannoneer No. 4
And since LOSAT out-ranges a tank gun, LOSAT will always have the first shot.
13 posted on 11/12/2003 1:15:55 PM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY SCARING FELLOW FREEPERS SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz
Right. Because terrain has been outlawed. (So only outlaws have terrain...)
15 posted on 11/12/2003 1:18:21 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
October 9, 2003: Looks like Department of Defense is determined to drive a stake into the heart of LOSAT and kill it off for good. LOSAT is a 177 pound, 162mm diameter missile that can destroy any tank in existence with a very high speed impact. The missile quickly accelerates to 5,000 feet per second and is guided straight to its target (up to 4,000 meters away), as seen by the gunner through a day or night-vision sight. LOSAT was simple, four could be mounted on a hummer, and it worked. Development began in 1988, but then came the end of the Cold War and hordes of armored vehicles the Soviet Union had long threatened to unleash on Western Europe. Interest in new anti-tank weapons diminished and the in 1992 Department of Defense put LOSAT on the back burner as a "research and development" project. In 1996, the Department of Defense tried to cancel LOSAT, but the army fought back and kept it alive, barely. But then came September 11, 2001 and in mid-2002 LOSAT was given an official designation (MGM-166A) and an order for 108 missiles, to be used by an army unit to see how they hold up under field conditions. But the Department of Defense is out to cut unneeded projects and LOSAT is again on the chopping block. In Iraq, Javelin gave troops in hummers an excellent anti-tank weapon. Javelin is now proven in combat and it's a lot lighter (the missile itself weighs 20 pounds, plus 15 pounds for the launch tube it is sealed and shipped in, and fired from.) At $75,000 a missile, Javelin isn't much cheaper than LOSAT, and Javelin's shorter range (2,500 meters) is not seen as a problem. So the Department of Defense is out to kill LOSAT once more, or at least put it on the back burner until some potential foe gathers together a really, really large army of armored vehicles.
27 posted on 11/12/2003 1:31:46 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Brave Rifles! Veterans! You have been baptized in fire and blood and have come out steel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Lazamataz
Thats not a given.The LOSAT system take ten minutes to reload and only has four 177# rounds, and realistically requires a crew of three men. It would be better utilised on an armoured vehicle, impervious to samll arms fire rather than a HMVVV, or even a Stryker, if it could be mounted on that platform.The Stryker is a monumental wste of meny and effort, it is slow despite its lack of armour and firepower,and extremely vunerralbe to all except the most basic of small arms.
85 posted on 11/13/2003 7:13:08 AM PST by IamEveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson