Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Logistics woes plagued Army division during, after Iraq war
govexec.com ^ | Nov 11, 03 | Katherine McIntire Peters

Posted on 11/12/2003 9:41:49 AM PST by inPhase

No military unit pushed farther and faster into Iraq during Operation Iraqi Freedom than the Army's 3rd Infantry Division. In just 21 days, through raging sandstorms and nearly continuous combat, the division charged 400 miles from Kuwait to Baghdad. It was a remarkable achievement for the storied division, known as the "Rock of the Marne" since World War I for its steadfast determination in battle as units around it retreated.

But ongoing problems in resupplying the division in Iraq last spring with essentials such as fuel and ammunition continually threatened the operation, according to a report recently issued by division officials.

"Many units operated dangerously low on ammunition, fuel, water and other sustainment items," according to the report.

Ammunition shortages were particularly troubling. While the division meticulously planned and coordinated replenishments, it "was completely uncoordinated at any level above. When ammunition did arrive in the ammunition supply point, it was usually in bulk, with incompatible quantities and types of rounds and fuses."

Among the logistics problems the report cited:

The division lacked enough explosives to destroy captured enemy weapons and munitions - a critical issue because those weapons, unless destroyed, could easily be turned against U.S. forces on the battlefield.

Turret mechanics for Bradley fighting vehicles lacked training and parts necessary to repair the vehicles' navigation systems and communications equipment.

Combat service support units intended to resupply units on the battlefield were unprepared for security requirements, and lacked machine gun mounts and adequate communications equipment. Because the supply units could not secure themselves during convoys, combat units had to divert assets to secure them.

A shortage of trucks hindered the division's ability to get supplies. Military planners had expected that Kuwait would be able to fill trucking shortfalls, but that assumption proved incorrect.

Water trailer tanks provided for the division's headquarters support unit proved insufficient to handle the unit's consumption, which exceeded 400 gallons per day.

Logisticians were unable to monitor the movement of and maintain communication with forces on the battlefield, making it difficult for them to anticipate and support logistics requirements.

The report also noted that "the continuing difficulty to sustain offensive operations, and extreme anxiety that failure might arrive at any moment," hampered the 3rd Infantry division's preparation for the transition to support operations in the postwar period. As military leaders have since learned, the unchecked looting rampage upon which Iraqis embarked following the war decimated the country's already fragile civil infrastructure, and has plagued reconstruction efforts.

Also contributing to the poor transition to postwar operations was a severe shortage of civil affairs troops - those soldiers trained to work with civilians to reestablish basic public services, such as water and electricity. According to the report, the blueprint by which civil affairs units were employed was "deficient in the following areas: manning, weapons, vehicles and communications."

The 422nd Civil Affairs Battalion, which was assigned to the 3rd Infantry Division in the attack on Baghdad, was too small for the job. The division needed 15 teams of civil affairs soldiers to support its maneuver battalions, brigade headquarters and tactical operations center, yet the 422nd was able to provide only five such teams. In addition, the teams didn't have enough firepower to defend themselves and their communications equipment was not always compatible with the units they were supposed to be supporting.

The report emphasized the need for earlier and better postwar planning in the future, particularly in prioritizing the protection of infrastructure, administrative buildings, financial institutions and historic, cultural and religious sites. "Without prioritizing, the unit will find itself protecting unimportant sites without enough forces to protect important sites," the report said.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 3rdid; aftermathanalysis; army; freedom; iraq; iraqi; logistics; sandstorms
The 422nd Civil Affairs Battalion, which was assigned to the 3rd Infantry Division in the attack on Baghdad, was too small for the job. The division needed 15 teams of civil affairs soldiers to support its maneuver battalions, brigade headquarters and tactical operations center, yet the 422nd was able to provide only five such teams. In addition, the teams didn't have enough firepower to defend themselves and their communications equipment was not always compatible with the units they were supposed to be supporting.
1 posted on 11/12/2003 9:41:49 AM PST by inPhase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: inPhase
Some of this is endemic to the Army throughout its history. Some kind of units just aren't sexy, but when you really need them, there are never enough.

Most of this, though, is due to the slow starvation the klintons put the military through. Repairing the damage, just to get back to pre-klinton numbers, is attacked as a "vast military buildup".

2 posted on 11/12/2003 9:48:09 AM PST by 300winmag (Photon Micro-lights: the next best thing to the Phial of Galadriel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inPhase
And look at what they accomplished in spite of these difficulties. Our gals and guys are to be commended for doing a magnificent job with what they had. No army anywhere is EVER going to get all they want nor need.

Michael

3 posted on 11/12/2003 9:48:30 AM PST by Wright is right! (Never get excited about ANYTHING by the way it looks from behind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!
I am a realist, and do not like seeing excessive casualties because of poor planning.

Mistakes were made!
4 posted on 11/12/2003 9:53:45 AM PST by inPhase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 300winmag
No doubt that what you say is a factor.
5 posted on 11/12/2003 9:54:57 AM PST by inPhase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: inPhase
The Lamestream media will pounce on this After Action Report (AAR) as though it were meant as inside criticism or feuding. It is not, it is meant to fine tune the training and fighting so the next time around we become better prepared. One of the reasons our military is so well prepared is because of this AAR process. The nattering naybobs will, of course, neglect to mention this to the American public.
6 posted on 11/12/2003 10:01:36 AM PST by capydick (Where did all these Useful Idiots come from?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!
And look at what they accomplished in spite of these difficulties. Our gals and guys are to be commended for doing a magnificent job with what they had. No army anywhere is EVER going to get all they want nor need.

Put another way, any division engaged in a hell-for-leather drive is going to have difficulties with its logistics along an ever-lengthening supply line, and in the face of constantly changing operational requirements. This is almost always going to define how far an offensive can go.

The real measure of a division, as of individual humans, is how it responds when things are difficult.

The 3rd ID kicked ass -- which tells us what we really need to know about them.

7 posted on 11/12/2003 10:03:45 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: capydick
Well said but I doubt that the media will take notice.

Big news today is backpeddling.
8 posted on 11/12/2003 10:06:52 AM PST by inPhase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dark Wing
ping
9 posted on 11/12/2003 10:08:42 AM PST by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 300winmag
Yep. SSDD. Amateurs talk tactics. Professionals talk logistics.
10 posted on 11/12/2003 10:20:51 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson