[lugsoul]

If you are not working from talking points, why do you single out Myron Thompson for attack when you ADMIT that you can't describe any aspect of his ruling that is not exactly in line with how he was required to rule on the case? Is it just because he is a democratic appointee and you think its easy? Or can you actually say what he did wrong?

[EternalVigilance]

I have said repeatedly what I think he, and his revisionist colleagues, did, and continue to do, wrong.

You just refuse to hear anything that doesn't agree with your preconceived notions.