Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: My Letter to Alabama Attorney General Pryor
Self | 11/11/2003 | Self

Posted on 11/11/2003 11:43:08 AM PST by farmer18th

Dear Mr. Pryor:

Your actions with respect to Judge Moore confuse me.

Is "Thou Shalt Not Steal" offensive to you? (I'm glad I don't own property in Alabama)

Is "Thou Shalt Not Murder" problematic for you? (I'm glad I don't live in Alabama)

Is "Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery" hurtful to you? (I'm glad you don't know my wife.)

Is "Thou Shalt not Bear False Witness" repugnant to you? (I'm glad I never had to seek justice in your state.)

Is "Thou Shalt Have no Other Gods Before Me" distasteful to you? (What with lightning bolts and all, I'm glad I dont worship next to you.)

We are a nation of laws, Mr. Pryor, and not of men. I'm just confused as to which laws you follow.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: billpryor; judgemoore; pryor; tencommandments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 521-539 next last
To: Looking for Diogenes
How does the 14th Amendment incorporate the third amendment when states are proscribed from having soldiers as distinct from militias?

Food for thought.

321 posted on 11/11/2003 4:36:40 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Exactly.
322 posted on 11/11/2003 4:40:40 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
There is absolutley no gain to be made in pitting Catholics against Evangelicals, Orthodox Jews or any other religion.

No offense was intended specifically to Catholics. I'm an equal opportunity critic of established branches of Christianity that don't think their faith should have a place in the public square. It's why we're in the mess we're in. Fair enough?
323 posted on 11/11/2003 4:41:38 PM PST by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Um, Mr. History Major? Need I point out the troublesome detail of the fact that Catholic Italy wasn't buying the whole antisemitic thing

Um, Mr. Contemplative? Need I point out that while avoiding anti-semitism is a good thing, Mussolini's fascism isn't much consolation?

If religion had a place in the PUBLIC square, moral idiots like Mussolini might not have had the field day they did? Heah?
324 posted on 11/11/2003 4:44:35 PM PST by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: farmer18th
Yup.
325 posted on 11/11/2003 4:44:45 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA
Pryor is AG of AL, not Bishop of Birmingham

Ergo, he simply must be a moral failure. I see where you're going.
326 posted on 11/11/2003 4:47:22 PM PST by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
How does the 14th Amendment incorporate the third amendment when states are proscribed from having soldiers as distinct from militias? Food for thought.

Rather meager food. The 3rd Amendment is the least debated section of the entire Constitution. It can stay that way, as far as I'm concerned.

327 posted on 11/11/2003 4:50:15 PM PST by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
The initial "pitting" by the way was done by Chancelor, who brayed warmly about his "contemplative" branch of Christianity over the "hick" theology of evangelicals, and, presumably, those who see justice in Judge Moore's fight.
328 posted on 11/11/2003 4:54:10 PM PST by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
How about the seventh amendment? Obviously the 14th does not incorporate it yet your cite says the first 8 amendments are incorporated by the 14th.

Do you believe in the tooth fairy as well?

Now, you tell me when the "total incorporation" theory of the 14th as applied to the BOR came into being. I'm curious as to just how conversant you are in the subject.

329 posted on 11/11/2003 4:56:16 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: farmer18th
Chancellor Jackboot interests me not one whit. My blue collar can whip his counselor's arse without getting a sweat stain on it.
330 posted on 11/11/2003 4:57:51 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: farmer18th
As an evangelical who is by no means anti-Catholic, I certainly took your comments in the spirit in which they were given.

Your actual point, ignored of course by your critics, about the difference between those who contemplate but don't act versus those who actually do something was well-taken and I think fair.
331 posted on 11/11/2003 4:58:14 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: farmer18th
I was referencing debate of course. :-}
332 posted on 11/11/2003 4:58:37 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 328 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Farmer18th: In the same way that Dred Scott resolved the issue of slavery? You think this is resolved?

Catspaw: For now it is.

I think you would have to admit that this is little more than legal proceduralism. The broader fight is about the truth, not about "law" as defined by lawyers. Some conservatives believe that God's ancient and immutable law should have a greater voice in public policy. Some purely economic conservatives--who prefer a more existential approach to their personal lives--think otherwise. Let the good fight begin. I know who's going to win.
333 posted on 11/11/2003 5:02:36 PM PST by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
How about the seventh amendment? Obviously the 14th does not incorporate it yet your cite says the first 8 amendments are incorporated by the 14th.

Don't you believe that the 7th Amendment applies to states? SCOTUS does. CAPITAL TRACTION CO. v. HOF, 174 U.S. 1 (1899)

Do you believe in the tooth fairy as well?

From someone who believes in fantastical legal arguments and mythical constitutional theories, that's an odd question to ask.

Now, you tell me when the "total incorporation" theory of the 14th as applied to the BOR came into being. I'm curious as to just how conversant you are in the subject.

What's my prize for answering your quiz?

334 posted on 11/11/2003 5:14:57 PM PST by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
What's my prize for answering your quiz?

Knowledge.

335 posted on 11/11/2003 5:16:12 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07; EternalVigilance
From "The Acts and Laws of His Majesty's Colony of New Hampshire" 1759:

..if any person shall presume wilfully to blaspheme the holy name of God, Father, Son or Holy Ghost, either by denying, cursing or reproaching the true God, his creation or government of the world; or by denying , cursing, or reproaching the holy word of God, that is the canonical scriptures....every one so offending shall be punished by imprisonment, not exceeding six months, ...by setting in the pillory, by whipping, boardig throgh the tongue with a red hot iron, or setting upon the gallows with a rope about their neck..."

Interesting side-light: you are four times more likely to be the victim of violent crime in Massachusetts today than when the pillory and stocks were employed.
336 posted on 11/11/2003 5:18:57 PM PST by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
Don't you believe that the 7th Amendment applies to states? SCOTUS does. CAPITAL TRACTION CO. v. HOF, 174 U.S. 1 (1899)

Wrong again Diogenes but hang in there.

337 posted on 11/11/2003 5:21:07 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: farmer18th
Those darned Founders! They were SO uncompassionate and insensitive! Devisive and hateful and meanspirited, too...

/sarcasm

;-)
338 posted on 11/11/2003 5:25:58 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
But this all is getting us nowhere fast.

Lets look at what the judicial activist, thats you, view of the 14th Amendment has given us and what it will give us in the future.

Unfettered abortion from conception until the baby is partially born.

Justice Kennedys "transcendent liberty" theory removing the matter of sodomy laws from the states.

Taken to its logical conclusion Kennedys majority opinionleads directly to homosexual marriage.

The 14th Amendment was meant to procure fundamental rights to all AMerican citizens. It has been perverted to consolidate power in 9 lawyers sitting in a building in Washington.

When they rule that the 14th Amendment guarantees a "transcendent liberty" for all Americans to be free of the threat of firearms and applies that to the state as well, perhaps you'll stop building the Brideg Over the River Kwai, but I doubt it.

339 posted on 11/11/2003 5:31:45 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Those darned Founders! They were SO uncompassionate and insensitive! Devisive and hateful and meanspirited, too...

The galling thing--AND I JUST CAN'T BELIEVE THIS--is that they wouldn't have been troubled by someone inscribing "thou shalt not commit murder" on the wall of a court! Man, that frosts me! Foisting their RELIGIOUS beliefs on people like that!
340 posted on 11/11/2003 5:38:26 PM PST by farmer18th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 521-539 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson