[sfRummygirl]

Oh, this is socialistic commie whatever, that's for sure. 100%.
There are a couple of head cases on these threads that quote all the right legalese, in their minds.....but the bottom line is they want the disabled and other folks who are 'in the way' dead. Period. All these statements about who can swallow, etc....it is just amazing.
I just look at them as sick now, that's all. Thank God I am not like them.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Thank God I am not like them.

You mean 'sick' I assume, not 'righteous' which would be a disastrous thing for anybody to claim. A word of caution: He who thinks he stands should take heed lest he fall.

[kenth]

There are a couple of head cases on these threads that quote all the right legalese

As HitechRedneck said above, they pretend to be impartial and to be the only ones not weighed down by emotion, thus the only ones thinking clearly. They attempt to discredit the fight for the life of another as mere emotional outbursts. When the attempts to demean us in that way do not work, they try the legal angle as sfRummygirl said.

They claim that we must sit back and watch another be killed because the courts say so, to do otherwise is to not be a good conservative. They claim to only acknowledge to law. But, they continually and conveniently overlook the conflict of the codified law with the state protected constitutional rights.

Truly a good is evil, evil good scenario if there ever was one.

[Future Useless Eater]

There are a couple of head cases on these threads that quote all the right legalese, in their minds...

> Its just my opinion, but, I believe all of us who engaged the person who monopolized this thread, may have actually been helping out none other that our good /friend> George Felos. I suggest it may actually have been HIM, tossing out his legal arguments, cross examining us, and practicing his responses. (Much the same way a presidential candidate 'practices' before a debate)

It struck me in most of his posts, his stand and his wording was EXACTLY what Felos would have said. Then I looked down at his screen name. and noticed it even LOOKED much like "george felos" I know, I know, by that reasoning, you might say it also looked like "george greer" Well, I'd say fine, but please state why you think so.

This poster has referred to freepers in ways that implied he was NOT one of them. This guy always argued the 'facts' The guy didn't care about truth, justice, fairness, just the 'facts', and by that, he always meant the 'settled law', that which is already 'cast into concrete', ie: the subjective bankrupt decisions of Judge Greer. The guy's 'facts' were always exactly as Felos would have stated them.

This poster made it clear he is very, very knowledgable of even the tiniest intricacies of this case, even of 'facts' argued all the way to the supreme court (that only a defense atty would know and propose). This guy even made stuff up on the fly, answering allegations very 'creatively', exactly like Felos would have done.

Only one other person here ever dismissed me by insisting I was 'non-factual', and not backing it up. And that person was a new poster, pretending to be a private eye. It wasn't long before he was dispatched by most Freepers with the dreaded 't' word.

I recommend Freepers ignore and avoid battling with this guy. And remember he ALSO issues veiled threats of hitting the abuse button and reporting US after HE has laid down sufficient 'bait'.