Posted on 11/11/2003 9:30:54 AM PST by ckca
|
||||
LifeSite Daily News
Monday November 10, 2003
Pope Urges Christian Political Activity Not to be "Obscured by Pragmatism"
Emphasizes that truth, rather than win-ability should govern political actions
VATICAN, November 10, 2003 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Pope John Paul II warned on Friday that Christians have a duty to be involved politically and that truth, rather than win-ability should govern political actions. (c) Copyright: LifeSite Daily News is a production of Interim Publishing. Permission to republish is granted (with limitation*) but acknowledgement of source is *REQUIRED* (use LifeSiteNews.com). |
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
Pause a moment to review these atheist "improvements" (man is far safer under a theocracy than under an a-theocracy):
But the most dangerous animal of all is the spiritually hot atheist. See post 21 for the murderous numbers generated by last century's most spiritually hot anyones.
"I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religion than it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."
"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own -- a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotism."
"I do not believe in the immortality of the individual, and I consider ethics to be an exclusively human concern with no superhuman authority behind it."
"If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for a reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed."
-Albert Einstein, German-born American physicist
Atomic bump.
Oxymnoron ... a figure of speech in which opposite, or contradictory ideas or terms are combined.
Only the Church stood squarely across the path of Hitler's campaign for suppressing truth. I never had any special interest in the Church before, but now I feel a great affection and admiration because the Church alone has had the courage and persistence to stand for intellectual truth and moral freedom. I am forced thus to confess that what I once despised I now praise unreservedly.Albert Einstein
Time Magazine, 12/23/40
Oxymnoron
Wrong. I've met far too many proselytizing (& arrogant & condescending & foolhardy & patronizing ... etc) atheists to disprove your silly notion that atheism cannot be "spiritually hot." Many atheists are so "spiritually hot" in their persecution of and hatred for theism/theists that the best descriptor of their "spiritually hot" nature is simply demonic.
Included are quotations from Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Abraham Lincoln and ... others.
Did I say there weren't? I'm no anti-Randian zealot.
My point is that you seem to want to exclude anyone who is religious from public office. I don't think that's a good idea.
Your assumption is wrong.
Reason tells me that there is something spiritual in every living creature -- it is within the faculty of consciousness.
Add to that the fact that animals perceive things. If you watch carefully, you can observe that animals (dogs, cats, etc.) react to things at a perceptual level. I suspect that what we see in those animals is perceptual level thought -- they that think without having any ability to think things through.
We have, at the human level, the faculty of reason; and as conscious animals we can use reason to "understand" (not everything) some things within our perceptions -- we have the ability to "understand" at conceptual, even abstract, levels of thinking.
I like to ask questions and seek answers. I understand that's a Jesuit approach.
What I like in political leadership is a non-religious -- rational -- approach; an approach that avoids mystical irrationalities; an approach that transcends wishful, or knee-jerk perceptual, (typical Democrat) thought.
But seriously, it seems that the most irrational people in public office tend to be the irreligious (Democrats). I'm not suggesting cause-and-effect here; just pointing out my observations.
There is no question that animals perceive; but what I've observed is that even we humans cannot comprehend all that we perceive. Around us during every conscious moment are countless unnoticed perceptions. When you look at a nightime sky, your focus is limited -- you might actually "see" a thousand stars while you focus you mind on the moon.
But seriously, it seems that the most irrational people in public office tend to be the irreligious (Democrats).
It's my guess that (in general) Democrats are every bit as religious as Republicans; but ... what word combination really makes sense: the "irrational religious," or the "irrational irreligious"?
Thank you for your reply.
Well, there is much disagreement among Catholics themselves and among Christians who are non-Catholic. Just in reference to the death penalty, for instance, you will find people of faith on both sides of the question. I believe the Pope is against it, but Catholics can be found that are both pro- and con-.
I do think that many liberals have missed the boat by ignoring the fact that people are motivated by spiritual considerations. I'm sure there are rational arguments for much of what they advocate, but I've found that what beliefs people hold through faith motivate their actions far more than the rational arguments.
I think the Pope is asking people to frame the issues more in light of spiritual thought, and to not be afraid to admit that spirituality is very important in their lives. JMO, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.