Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Not sure that I've sufficiently expressed just how momentous was this interview and Gore's speech.

The Democrats can no longer be considered a "loyal opposition" offering a constructive critique of the party in power. They are now flatly claiming that the Bush administration is using the war on terrorism as a pretext for stealing personal liberties away from the American people.

That is one of the ugliest, most serious allegations that could possibly be made. The Democrats are accusing the Republicans of using American blood to undermine the Constitution.

That the liberal media are aiding and abetting the Dems, as demonstrated this morning, is an interesting if less important sidenote.

We have entered a new political epoch. The Dems, fearing that the political landscape is shifting against them in some fundamental way, are pulling out all the stops in this desperate, brutal assault on the Bush administration.
9 posted on 11/10/2003 4:48:39 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: governsleastgovernsbest
At the very least, I wish Lauer had asked Daschle, and by extension Gore, why they think that the Bush administration would have any interest in taking away Americans' civil liberties.
10 posted on 11/10/2003 4:50:26 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
The want an independent counsel. Expect them to say and claim anything to get it.

They want to see all that "INTEL" that President Bush has.

They don't care what they have to do to get those two things.
32 posted on 11/10/2003 5:46:27 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I couldn't agree more. I heard a speech by Gore, and first, I noticed the same ingredients as all the other Dem Candidates. The second thing I noticed is that Gore sounded like he was just reading a teleprompter and had no clue what words his mouth was saying. The audience was fairly silent and it sounded like people were going "huh?".

Then he stopped and there was a round of applause. I could just picture this scene. Gore stops speaking and a round of applause ensues from the applause machine, and the camera turns to the audience seating, where you see one street bum asleep in a seat. All other seats are empty.

Then I heard another Dem Pres. Candidate on some talk show, and he had the same spiel. He was asked what HE would do about Iraq, and he went into his tirade about NATO and getting the Iraqi's permission before the forces attacked Saddam.

The lead asked him what if Germany and France vetoed attack via NATO as well. Well, that screwed up his answer, so he did the DEM thing. He said, "I just can't see that happening." Then as he continued, he started backtracking about passing the bill to support the troops, not pulling out until Iraq is safe, etc. So, in the end, he wound up agreeing with Bush's actions, but tried to act like he didn't. His remark about getting the Iraqi's permission had me LMAO!

Just like many other Democratic plans, you send one email to: Joe Citizen, IRAQ. If Joe says OK, then you can attack.

47 posted on 11/10/2003 10:21:42 AM PST by UCANSEE2 ("Duty is ours, Results are God's" --John Quincy Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
The Dems, fearing that the political landscape is shifting against them in some fundamental way, are pulling out all the stops in this desperate, brutal assault on the Bush administration.

Democratic voters are usually the working stiff, and the oblivious. By that I mean those who are isolated from the everyday worries of the world, and who are in the throes of money and power, in one way or another. Like Hollywierdians.

The working stiff is a Democrat usually because he is union, and Organized Crime runs that. OC votes Democratic, because they want Democracy, no Republic. OC picked Democrat because they were the largest voting base, that was buyable. OC owns the DEM politicians, the media, Hollywierd, and the OC here in the US is dishonorable partners with the 300 some terrorist organizations, the Red Mafia, any crime outfit in the world.

They do not like Bush because he isn't a shady dealer. He won't look the other way.

They liked Iraq the way it was, because there were opportunities to exploit.

We traded Saddam food and medicine for oil, instead of giving him money. He sold it on the black market and likely fed the money into the terrorists, who by that time were gaining control of Iraq. 5000 Children a month died because of lack of that medicine.

Who do you think bought that food and medicine, and what did they do with it? Maybe you bought it. Paid for it twice, we did.

The media doesn't talk about that issue either.

We are fighting Organized Crime on a world-wide basis, with the Al Queda as the most powerful, at the moment, in Iraq,Syria, Afghanistan, Arabia, etc. They just demonstrated that their true goal is power, not their religion, as they killed NON-INFIDELS (Arabs) in Saudi Arabia to punish them for cooperating with the US.

They are using the Muslim religion for cover to run an Organized Crime front in the middle east. It's that simple, and President Bush knows it too. Solving the problem is, of course, very complicated, and must be done diplomatically. Which, Bush is doing.

Another thing I noticed is the Dems keep saying "Bush's failed war" or "Bush's failed plans".

This must be a talking point.

I fail to see where there has been a failure so far. Everything went better than expected, and everything that has happened since, Bush told us to expect.

Anyway (sorry I wandered),

48 posted on 11/10/2003 10:40:41 AM PST by UCANSEE2 ("Duty is ours, Results are God's" --John Quincy Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson