Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
I don't believe the name of the game for the democrats is to win the Presidency. I think the real name of the game is to win back the House and Senate. If they can win control of Congress, they could create havoc for President Bush and since he won't be able to run again, they can set up 2008 for Hillary.

In any event, the democrats will screw things up again.
14 posted on 11/09/2003 11:10:55 AM PST by BMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: BMC1
I think the real name of the game is to win back the House and Senate.

Won't happen. Barring a presidential scandal that makes Watergate look like, well, a third-rate burglary, The Dems have no chance whatsoever to even prevent a further loss of seats in 2004, much less regain control of either chamber. Even they know this, and are thus aiming what little money they have at state races and attempts to retain the Congressional seats they already control.

Practically all current analyses predict meaningful gains for the GOP in both the House and Senate next year. It's even possible - though by no means probable, at least not yet - that we could end up with a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. The Dems are that screwed going into November 2004.

16 posted on 11/09/2003 11:19:35 AM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: BMC1
Your suggestion about the Democrats taking control of either the House or the Senate is foolish. If you've been following the Texas redistricting flap, you know that was about the Republicans gaining another five Congressmen from that state alone, by making the boundaries of the districts reflect by results the voting preferences of Texas citizens.

If you have been following the resignations of Southern Democratic Senators, including Zell Miller, you know that the Republicans stand to pick up four or five Senators -- even if Thune decides to retake his House seat and doesn't hand Li'l Tommy Dashcle his well-deserved and final defeat.

In short, the Democrats have zero chance to take control of either House of Congress, based on hard-headed analysis of the facts on the ground. I'd be curious to see why you think otherwise.

Especially, why do you think the "real strategy" is to retake the House and Senate at the same time that the Democrats' presidential nominee is going down the toilet? It's sort of like throwing a drowning man an anchor rather than a life buoy, don't you think?

John / Billybob

27 posted on 11/09/2003 11:37:41 AM PST by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: BMC1
I think the real name of the game is to win back the House and Senate. If they can win control of Congress, they could create havoc for President Bush and since he won't be able to run again, they can set up 2008 for Hillary.

I think you may be onto something here. McCaulif and the Xlintoons are hopelessly liberal but they're not stupid, on the contrary they're criminal masterminds. If they can pick up a few seats in the senate Bush will not get a single judicial nominee in, they can stall any tax cuts , they can bring any reforms to a halt and Bush and the republicans get all the blame. Remember they count on the ignorance of the average voter. Once things are all mucked up on '08, along comes her highness to the rescue.

108 posted on 11/09/2003 3:22:38 PM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson