To: Salvation
This is surprising. The story seemed to be fading with no traction, and the Repubs were playing kiss-and-makeup at first. I figured they'd keep it in their pocket to block any future independent investigation, but I didn't expect they'd make a big show of the memo like this.
I wonder what changed their minds?
Oh, and why are the Dems assuming the memo was stolen? As far as I've heard Hannity has been mum on the source to the extent it could have been a Dem staffer. Is there evidence otherwise?
To: HarryCaul
You asked, "I wonder what changed their minds?" ... (to make a big deal out of this memo). My guess is Sean told some Pubby just who sent the copy, and it was a patriotic dem staffer (yes, there are some, and they must be suffering terribly as the clintonization/McAwfulism to their party pushs it further into the sewer of sedition) who couldn't let the democrat treachery go unexposed! Being a dem source makes the democrat outrage and bluster of 'stolen' all the more damning to the fools on the "D" side.
156 posted on
11/08/2003 1:04:32 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: HarryCaul
A little history please? When and how did Sean break the news about this memo? On his radio or television show? I do not listen or watch either of them. Thank you.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson