To: rhema; Fzob
This has got to be one of the most disturbing articles ever posted. It reminds me of Hannity or Leno doing a 'man on the street' interview-- ignorance on parade.
The people who named their baby 'Del Monte' are allowed to vote! Gee, I wonder if think Dan Rather is telling the truth?
5 posted on
11/08/2003 3:55:54 AM PST by
ovrtaxt
( http://www.fairtax.org **** Forget ANWR. Drill Israel !)
To: ovrtaxt
The people who named their baby 'Del Monte' are allowed to vote! They are probably multi-generational lifetime entitlements receipients (ahhh... "clients" to the multitude gainfully employed in that industry) as well.
To: ovrtaxt
Twenty three years ago when my brother was having a child, his wife chose the name Brooke if it was a girl. My brother put his foot down because our last name is Linn and he didn't want to saddle a child with the name: Brooke Linn. Fast forward to the present. I own a store which hosts many children. So far this year I've seen three girls named Brooklyn. That's their first name. It's so incredibly stupid I feel like slapping the parents.
168 posted on
11/08/2003 9:51:44 AM PST by
Hildy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson