Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Theodore R.
> Schiavo says that he is a very compassionate man, and he is withholding food and water to let Terri "be free."

MS has spent something like a half-million dollars for legal help to kill Terri. For a man of modest means, that is an ASTOUNDING amount of money just to "carry out her wishes."

It doesn't make sense. He hates Terri. We know he expressed his real feelings for her by the DNR order, stealing her therapy money, stealing her wedding rings, refusing to give her medicine, denying her the Communion host, all that sort of thing. Not to mention screwing around with other women. In short, in the very kindest view, he has no love whatever for her, and has not loved her for many years.

Nor is he doing it to "honor" her "wishes" -- MS has no honor in him, and there isn't a scrap of evidence Terri had any such wishes. So, what else would motivate this extraordinarily expensive attack on her?

Could be hatred, could be some wish to finish his 1990 attack on her, could be fear of discovery of that attack if there's an autopsy. A profit motive doesn't seem to make sense because the effort to kill her gets increased even as the potential inheritance dwindles.

What am I missing? Is there something deeper going on here with this shady-looking Hospice business, the sealed medical and financial records, the parents' deaths...? We should get out our Hercule Poirot gray cells and brainstorm every avenue.

970 posted on 11/09/2003 8:35:43 PM PST by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 952 | View Replies ]


To: T'wit; Theodore R.
could be fear of discovery of that attack if there's an autopsy

And could have been fear of her getting well enough to have talked about that attack. According to nurses' testimony, she was talking, she was improving, she was expressing herself...

976 posted on 11/09/2003 8:45:08 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 970 | View Replies ]

To: T'wit
I think he is driven by money.......where it is, I don't know.

But I also think he is driven because he doesn't want the truth to come out.....about what really happened to her that night.
979 posted on 11/09/2003 8:46:58 PM PST by Shortstop7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 970 | View Replies ]

To: T'wit
What am I missing?

Maybe that things have gone too far? If he were to divorce her now, he could be liable to pay all the money back to Terri that he spent on lawyers. And there is the matter of fierce pride, revenge, and winning imo.

984 posted on 11/09/2003 8:50:45 PM PST by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 970 | View Replies ]

To: T'wit
I agree with your post, and I think it just goes to show how evil Michael is. That someone would want someone else to die badly enough that they would be willing to spend a fortune doing it, somehow it just doesn't add up. You could be the most loving person in the world and you would give up in this case out of that love. If Terri's parents want her to live so badly, then why would any "model husband" not turn over the guardianship to them? That would be the honorable thing to do. Even if he were telling the truth about Terri's desire to not be "hooked up" to life support (which I don't believe for a minute), don't you think he would have enough doubt to quit fighting the Schindlers? This is just one of many reasons why Michael is not telling the whole truth about this case.

A profit motive doesn't seem to make sense because the effort to kill her gets increased even as the potential inheritance dwindles.

That's partly where Felos comes in to play. He found another landmark case with Terri that he can add to his resume. I have no doubt that part of the reason that MS and Felos argued so vehemently to keep Terri's image out of the spotlight is so that they can profit from her "death with dignity". Think of the book and movie deals. Felos is partially responsible for continually egging Michael on in this quest for fame and power (and money).

The very fact that Felos came in to the Schiavo case at precisely the time he did, just begs to have the whole thing looked at closely by the authorities, especially those who might look into the hospice issues going on. Hospice pays for Terri's care for some three years. Not only is it against the rules for Terri to be admitted into the hospice, the likelihood that anyone would be allowed to live there "rent free" for three years, much less six months, is unheard of!

996 posted on 11/09/2003 9:08:24 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 970 | View Replies ]

To: T'wit
A profit motive doesn't seem to make sense because the effort to kill her gets increased even as the potential inheritance dwindles.

Felos and Jodi probably both know enough to blackmail Michael, and both would stand to lose a whole lot of money if Michael ever loses guardianship. Michael may not have much money to his name, but he's given away a lot of money which doesn't belong fully to him; a divorce would probably demand that that money be repaid.

1,012 posted on 11/09/2003 9:26:39 PM PST by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 970 | View Replies ]

To: T'wit; sweetliberty
You hit it-he has to HATE Terri. Someone (sweetliberty?) posted photos of Terri shortly after her injury, and one of her more recently. I turned to my husband and said "that is what HE (MS) has done to her". Only God knows how well she might be doing now if Hubby Dearest had not denied therapy. It is obvious she has gone downhill because of his "guardianship".
1,017 posted on 11/09/2003 9:29:40 PM PST by Annie03 (donate at www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 970 | View Replies ]

To: T'wit
Could be hatred, could be some wish to finish his 1990 attack on her, could be fear of discovery of that attack if there's an autopsy. A profit motive doesn't seem to make sense because the effort to kill her gets increased even as the potential inheritance dwindles.

Could it be pressure from the new woman in his life?

By 1995, Michael was in love with and living with another woman, whom he had been seeing for about two years. They would eventually have a child, even though Michael stayed legally married to Terri.

http://www.evelynmartens.ca/en-newsday-030414.html

According to this article he would have been seeing Jodi in 1993...the year he collected the money and ordered a DNR order on Terri's charts. He took small steps towards Terri's death for a few years. Was it mounting pressure from Jodi that caused him to seek out Felos? They had been living together for a couple of years and most of the money was still there, but Terri just wouldn't die. When Felos entered the picture Michael's engagement was annouced, people started dying and the money soon disappeared. Love and money can be a deadly combination...

1,060 posted on 11/09/2003 10:55:31 PM PST by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 970 | View Replies ]

To: T'wit
Aren't you surprise, T'wit, that you have all these "inquiring" questions about this case, and yet Peter, Dan, Tom, Katie, and even the National Enquirer don't have the slightest interest in "this story" about "a vegetable."
1,086 posted on 11/10/2003 6:11:55 AM PST by Theodore R. (te)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 970 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson