To: iowamomforfreedom
Well, this explains why the FL Supreme Court never heard the appeal from the Schindlers. It had already made up its collective mind in favor of "death with dignity" -- Schiavo-style. Now, though if the Schindler are appealing a unfavorable ruling from Baird and the appeals court to the Supreme Court, we know that the Supreme Court will reject the case again, thereby ruling against Terri and the governor. This FL Supreme Court is primarily against any Bush first and foremost. The fact that the Bushes have tried to help Terri is all they need to know. This court will say that Terri must die NOW. Then, can another law be written to address what the court striked down. Doubtful.
Were Terri to win before Baird and the appeals court, probably impossible in FL now, the Supreme Court would take the case and strike down Terri's Law. Will three more FL Supreme Court judges be voted on in 2004 -- yes and no plebiscites?
To: Theodore R.
Yes, the FL supremes already have their minds made up. They believe in killing the inconvenient and useless eaters.
I believe Terri's hope lies in exposing MS as an abusive and unfit guardian, thus removing him from the picture.
Unfortunately, in Florida he has the right to kill her, if he is her guardian. He has to be removed from that position to save her.
1,211 posted on
11/10/2003 2:26:38 PM PST by
iowamomforfreedom
(Why is it illegal to starve an animal but not a human being?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson