Here we go
1 posted on
11/07/2003 7:40:10 AM PST by
GeronL
To: mhking; Sabertooth; Travis McGee; Sawdring; JohnHuang2
This deserves a big play
2 posted on
11/07/2003 7:47:30 AM PST by
GeronL
(Visit www.geocities.com/geronl)
To: GeronL
BS. Iran's government is a different regime from the one we signed the treaty with.
To: GeronL
Further evidence that refusing to acknowledge the ICC is a good policy.
To: GeronL
To borrow a famous phrase,
Let them enforce it.
Seems to me most rational people would accept that when agreements are breached, overtly or covertly, the agreement is null and void.
Anybody have the coordinates of the delusional, so-called "world court"?
8 posted on
11/07/2003 8:07:20 AM PST by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: GeronL
We signed that treaty with The Shah. Did we recognize the govt. currently running Iraq in 1988?
10 posted on
11/07/2003 8:20:10 AM PST by
.cnI redruM
(Mouthing support for the workingman is one of the best ways to avoid actually being one.)
To: GeronL
Oh, and small boat attacks, taking hostages, and firing on aircraft in international airspace are all ok .. Freakin Idiots!
11 posted on
11/07/2003 8:22:16 AM PST by
BlueNgold
(Feed the Tree .....)
To: GeronL
I think I heard one of the whiners on TV recently complaining that President Bush didn't respect international courts. Obvious why, isn't it?
12 posted on
11/07/2003 8:24:11 AM PST by
FreePaul
To: GeronL
I say we offer them a cash settlement ... all they have to do is come pick it up. For accounting purposes we will make 2 payments. One will be available on a crate in the COs driveway at Camp Lejeune, the other in a similar location at Camp Pendleton.
13 posted on
11/07/2003 8:26:45 AM PST by
BlueNgold
(Feed the Tree .....)
To: GeronL
This is a wash, Yes we violated the treaty, No the Iranians don't get any money.
0-0 tie
14 posted on
11/07/2003 8:30:30 AM PST by
GreenLanternCorps
("Vietnam was, in truth, a noble cause." - Ronald Wilson Reagan)
"The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ruled in favour of Iran in its claim that the late-1980s bombing by the United States of its oil platforms in the Persian Gulf was in breach of a treaty between the two countries. " The International Court of Justice has sent Aquaman to patrol the waters.
![](http://gorobotgo.com/aquaman.jpg)
15 posted on
11/07/2003 8:31:47 AM PST by
At _War_With_Liberals
(It took Zell Miller 1 minute to say what Republicans have been afraid to say for years...)
To: GeronL
International Court of Justice rules in favour of Iran in oil platforms caseAnd???????
'scuse me, joke's over, I'm going back to sleep now :)
18 posted on
11/07/2003 9:17:22 AM PST by
upchuck
(Encourage HAMAS to pre-test their explosive devices. A dud always spoils everything.)
To: GeronL
"Judge Shi Jiuyong"
A CCP Judge?
Gee, I wonder why they ruled against the US?
19 posted on
11/07/2003 9:41:21 AM PST by
Dr. Marten
(To be conscious that you are ignorant is a great step to knowledge)
To: GeronL
20 posted on
11/07/2003 10:58:22 AM PST by
Tailgunner Joe
(Only UN-Americans put the UN before America!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson