To: kattracks
I agree with little Dean has to say about anything ... however, where this issue is concerned he's absolutely right on the money.
11 posted on
11/07/2003 3:11:20 AM PST by
BluH2o
To: BluH2o
One really needs to walk in those shoes in order to be entitled to an opinion. Keeping someone -- or a pet, for matter -- alive is not always an act of mercy.
I do not equate taking someone off artificial life-support with abortion. One life is viable, the other is not.
To: BluH2o
I should have been more clear that I am agreeing with you. And with Dean.
To: BluH2o
I agree with little Dean has to say about anything ... however, where this issue is concerned he's absolutely right on the money. Dean is a fool, an idiot and the rear of a donkey. But like you, I AGREE WITH DEAN on this issue.
25 posted on
11/07/2003 4:34:43 AM PST by
Drango
(Democratic fund rasing... If PBS won't do it, who will?)
To: BluH2o
I gather you were not one of us who attended the vigil outside the Hospice where Terri Schiavo was sentenced to die from forced starvation/dehydration for the crime of having become severely disabled, and needing help in securing food?
Bite me.
If you think it correct that the current judicial system of the USA can determine who may lve, and who must die for the good of society, I submit your personal continued physical existance for judicial oversight and judgement.
Justify your right to exist, against my accusation that you would not want to continue to live as a terminally ignorant and useless human being.
Prove to the world that you have worth, or accept that your very life is a subject open to legal debate.
Since it is your life, I am sure you would not burden society with futile arguments as to your worth to the rest of society.We get to vote, dont we?
121 posted on
11/07/2003 8:11:06 PM PST by
sarasmom
(Pray for TerriSchiavo. Everything I post is my opinion, unless otherwise stipulated.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson