Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Lincoln tried to hold on to federal property and tried to enforece the laws. Lincoln didn't invade South Carolina or any other southren state.

BZZZT! Wrong. Lincoln did not stop at simply taking the forts as his quote suggested he would do. Rather, he marched armies into the southern states in hostility against their people and used those armies to coerce obedience. And that, by Lincoln's very own definition, is an invasion.

He took no hostile actions against any southern state prior to the southern initiation of hostilities at Sumter.

Yes he did. He dispatched the fleet a week before Fort Sumter to provoke a military conflict.

207 posted on 11/08/2003 8:59:09 AM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]


To: GOPcapitalist
...he marched armies into the southern states in hostility against their people and used those armies to coerce obedience.

After the Davis regime initiated hostilities at Sumter. Once they started the war Lincoln had no choice but to respond.

Yes he did. He dispatched the fleet a week before Fort Sumter to provoke a military conflict.

Nonsense. Lincoln sent men and supplies to Sumter and Pickens in order to hold on to the forts belonging to the United States, just like he said he was going to do.

226 posted on 11/09/2003 4:38:09 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson