OK. Mentioning me as being equally undesirable as Clinton is OK, but me calling him the title he's earned with that remark isn't.
I guess that Clintonian word-parsing makes beyond-the-pale insults acceptable in your world.
In that light...I shan't say what I think of you.
Knowing flurry's posting personality, I took his comment not as calling you "equally undesirable" but rather to state that he would prefer to have Col West fighting by his side than either one of you. If you want to take that as calling you "equally undesirable" or as "comparing you to clinton" then that is your prerogative. If you consider his comment a "beyond-the-pale insult" then I guess I understand why you jumped into name-calling mode so quickly. Of course, the name-calling does make your argument appear weaker.