Skip to comments.
Attorney general's remarks about misconduct allegations anger Schwarzenegger
Associated Press ^
| 11-06-03
Posted on 11/06/2003 3:56:55 PM PST by Brian S
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:44:41 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Gov.-elect Arnold Schwarzenegger will hire a private investigator to look into allegations that he groped women, but he may keep the results from the state attorney general, a spokesman said Thursday.
Schwarzenegger's reluctance to turn over the results of the investigation stem from remarks Attorney General Bill Lockyer made earlier Thursday. The Democrat said he advised Schwarzenegger that the misconduct allegations "are not going to go away" and he should cooperate with an independent investigation.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; US: California
KEYWORDS: billlockyer; catrans; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
1
posted on
11/06/2003 3:56:56 PM PST
by
Brian S
To: Brian S
What are the recall options for attorneys General?
2
posted on
11/06/2003 4:02:06 PM PST
by
billhilly
(If you're lurking here from DU, I trust this post will make you sick)
To: billhilly
Yeah, they sure were full of zeal about going after a possible rapist who intimidated sexual harassment lawsuit witnesses. And then when Betty Currie's brother died, they sure howled about that, huh?
To: Brian S
Perhaps Arnold's PI can do a little overtime work on Lockyer while he's at it.
To: Brian S
Aren't these the same people who crowed, "it's his private life" when Clinton did it?
5
posted on
11/06/2003 4:07:35 PM PST
by
what's up
To: Brian S
I'm confused. I thought Lockyer voted for Arnold and is supporting him.
What the heck is all this about?
D
To: anniegetyourgun
Perhaps Arnold's PI can do a little overtime work on Lockyer while he's at it.No need to. There's already a public record. Posted here on FR in the mid 90's.
To: Brian S
This post has been added to the
California In Transition- Must read Threads!
Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin
8
posted on
11/06/2003 4:24:23 PM PST
by
DoctorZIn
To: Brian S
Ooooo..Lockyer WANTS it to be a stain, obviously.
Place own head on Block, here.
Attorney General wants the spotlight, eigh...well maybe he's done it, but good. I hope so.
9
posted on
11/06/2003 4:29:48 PM PST
by
PoorMuttly
("You cannot be a victim and a hero." - Hon. Clarence Thomas)
To: anniegetyourgun
Maybe Arnold could hire PI Pellacano, former Clinton PI in California. He could use the money, and according to DRUDGE, the FBI already has 2 billion pages from his computer, including illegal wiretap transcripts. Maybe some of the same women accused Clinton. Which Clinton? Take your pick.
10
posted on
11/06/2003 4:32:48 PM PST
by
billhilly
(If you're lurking here from DU, I trust this post will make you sick)
To: daviddennis
Lockyer is a liberal Dem and a member of the Davis administration. He did not support Arnold during the campaign. So I would be surprised if he actually did vote for Arnold. Lockyer's remarks are obviously a typical Dem ploy both a fishing expedition and a political shove to see how the soon-to-be Republican governor reacts. Notice how they call kept passing the buck down the food-chain, though. Lockyer says an investigation is the district attorney's responsibility. The DA says it's the responsibility of the cops. Just proves that all Lockyer is practicing is the standard Dem version of "bipartisanship."
11
posted on
11/06/2003 4:33:00 PM PST
by
Wolfstar
(An angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.)
To: Brian S
...During California's Recall Election Att. Gen. LOCKYEAR delcared that he would not stand for Recall Target GRAY DAVIS waging a dirty campaign ARNOLD ...like he did all his opponents in the past.
...As always, LOCKYEAR Lied.
12
posted on
11/06/2003 5:15:32 PM PST
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com)
To: ALOHA RONNIE
The last thing the Dems need is to remind folks about the vicious smear campaign they and the LA Times ran. The Dems should be on suicide watch.
13
posted on
11/06/2003 6:39:24 PM PST
by
claudiustg
(Go Sharon! Go Israel!)
To: claudiustg
DAVID SHAW - L.A. Times Media Critic should have some rather interesting things to say when he writes the Definitive Exposee on all this..?
14
posted on
11/06/2003 7:05:12 PM PST
by
ALOHA RONNIE
(Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LZXRAY.com)
To: daviddennis
You're confused. What is Ahnold investigating? Didn't he apologize for this stuff?
To: Wolfstar
To: John Jorsett
The real question that Arnold will have to answer is: What was he groping for?
17
posted on
11/06/2003 7:54:32 PM PST
by
meenie
To: daviddennis
What the heck is all this about?
most likely a cover-up
18
posted on
11/06/2003 8:26:44 PM PST
by
attagirl
To: billhilly
What are the recall options for attorneys General?
Uh, being as Lockyer is a Rat, they're looking the other way - as predicted (by me, anyway) the machinations for Recall Number Two are already underway.
19
posted on
11/06/2003 8:29:20 PM PST
by
ErnBatavia
(Santa Ana wind and fire season runs thru late November..we're just beginning)
To: John Jorsett
Just because Lockyer says he voted for Arnold, doesn't mean he actually did. It's easy to say he did just to ingratiate yourself with the new governor, because he knows there's no way anyone can prove it one way or another. Maybe he did; maby not. But he's a partisan liberal Dem, which makes him untrustworthy in my book, politically speaking.
20
posted on
11/07/2003 10:20:52 AM PST
by
Wolfstar
(An angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson