[rwfromkansas]

Who knows. The "earthquake machine" was an occillator, so we would have had to have found some other way of doing it to get it over larger areas probably.

[Quix]

Regardless of what the aptitude tests said, I understood relatively zilch about physics.

But it seems to my layman's craziness . . . that . . .

Given the ET CRAFT's oscillation . . . factors? components? dynamics?

There would probably be something using the magnetic/gravity manipulating technologies to engineer the sorts of potent oscillations needed to project forceful disruptions focusable at a distance--perhaps even transmissable over great distances.

But, as I said, this is really blind groping leading the blind over a thought cliff.

But I'd be interested in HOW FAR off the wall such ideas are or aren't.

[JustPiper]

AKA Rimbaldi on Alias -g-