Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colonel West...you've got my back any time
Self | 6 Nov 2003 | Jeff Head

Posted on 11/06/2003 4:44:20 AM PST by Jeff Head

The following is Lt. Col. Allen B. West's own candid comment regarding the situation he faced in Iraq, as reported by the Washington Dispatch on November 5, 2003:

"I have never denied what happened and have always been brutally honest," said Col. West. "I accept responsibility for the episode, but my intent was to scare this individual and keep my soldiers out of a potential ambush. There were no further attacks from that town. We ... apprehended two other conspirators (a third fled town) and found out one of the conspirators was the father of a man we had detained for his Saddam Fedeyeen affiliation. "
Colonel West takes personal responsibility for his actions. He makes no bones about it, he threatened this Iraqi spy bodliy harm to get information from him. And that is what he was, a spy working within the Iraqi Police Force that has been established and supported by the coalition authority. As a spy, under the so-called rules of war, I believe he could have shot the man. Perhaps that is an angle that should be explored.

In either case, Colonel West's actions no doubt saved the lives of Americans...the lives he is principally responsible for...and that was his motivation.

He understood that while he may have violated the rules (and he admits to and takes responsibility for this as well)...he also understood he was going to do what had to be done, in a war zone, to save the lives of the men under his command.

The rules were written by men and women sitting in safe seats far away from combat and the brutal reality of the moment. For the most part they are good rules and should not be violated. But there are times when the SHTF that you have to do what you must to save the lives of those you are responsible for, American lives, and accomplish the mission. Colonel West knew his greater responsibility and he performed it, regardless of personal cost. The trait of a true leader in my book.

President Truman incinerated tens of thousands of Japanese to save hundreds of thousands of Americans...and in so doing he also saved millions of Japanese. In today's world and PC nomenclature this might be considered a war crime...a violation of the "rules". But back then it was heralded by the soldiers as a God-send...and by Americans back home as what had to be done to end the war. People who had seen for themsleves the cold reality of four years of World War.

That generation is dying out and it seems we have forgottent their experiences and the lessons.

The reality is, that by scaring this man in the fashion he did...West not only saved American lives...he saved the lives of Iraqis as well.

God bless you Colonel West...you've got my back any time!

Charlie Mike.

Jeff


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: allenwest; colonelwest; combat; iraqifreedom; patriotism; valor; warzone; westforcongress; wildwest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-417 next last
To: The Mayor; JesseHousman
Oops...that should be:

Thanks for the BUMPS

21 posted on 11/06/2003 5:05:23 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Jeff, in your future history series, victory required that the C-in-C chosen in 2000 be replaced at the head of the 2004 ticket by someone who was a capable war leader who could fight our enemies undeterred by political correctness.

As 2004 draws closer, how does our real C-in-C look to you now, particularly in light of this story?

I know you are praying for him-I am, too-but what's your take on his adequacy in the job?

22 posted on 11/06/2003 5:06:05 AM PST by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
The following article shows that LTC West Intended to save lives he did not certainly save lives.
Number of Attacks in Iraq Constant, Enemy Tactics Change By Jim Garamone American Forces Press Service
"The number of attacks fluctuates. The beginning of Maysaw six to 30 attacks each day. The upper number has dropped; in October, the average has fluctuated from the mid-teens to low 20s."

We have on average lost 1-2 soldiers daily but the attacks number from 6 to the low 20s, then it is obvious that not every attack results in lives lost. This proves that LTC West's intentions were in the right place, but to defend his actions based on that is going a bit far.

He obviously does have the courage of his convictions. But you are incorrect when you state "West knew his greater responsibility and he performed it, regardless of personal cost" because his greatest responsibility is to be simultaneously a leader of men and a follower of his leaders. His leaders no doubt have told him in almost uncountable ways not to do what he did. He disregarded those orders entirely. And for that he must be disciplined.

There are many here who will attack me for this reply, but it is not opinion, it is fact. I do not think this man deserves to be thrown out of the Army with a felony conviction and loss of retirement benefits. None of that has happened yet, and I do not think it will. The outrage revolves around the opinion of one JAG officer, who had no choice but to state the charges as they were seen by him. I have confidence that LTC West's chain of command will discipline him in a way that is fair and right.

23 posted on 11/06/2003 5:06:32 AM PST by Ispy4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Very well said.
If disciplinary procedures are to be followed, so be it. The breach of faith occurs here: the "offer" of voluntary resignation to a 19-year valor-decorated soldier to avoid the hassle. That is despicable and dishonorable. Whoever came up with that idea has no honor, no pride, no soul.
24 posted on 11/06/2003 5:07:33 AM PST by GopherIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: thiscouldbemoreconfusing
As I ponder this, I can not help but think to myself how rare good solid O5's and O6's are. After eight years of clinton and I'm sorry to say, the four previous years, I am a bit surprised that there are any "God, Honor, Duty, Country" officers willing to put their men first left above the rank of O3.

I am sure that most got out...but some stayed. The ones who were motivated to put up with the BS...to remain in position "under fire" so to speak, so they could help ensure it did not all go the PC route.

25 posted on 11/06/2003 5:08:02 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Personally, I see nothing wrong with the West approach. I'm reminded of another highly-publicized interrogation of some terrorists. Our interrogation team was having no success in getting them to talk until we brought in some interrogators dressed like Saudis. (Saudis, I might add, are well-known for their torture techniques.) Once the terrorists saw what they thought were Saudis, they began spilling their guts. Sometimes mere intimidation works.
26 posted on 11/06/2003 5:09:13 AM PST by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GopherIt
I agree with you. That offer should not have been made.
27 posted on 11/06/2003 5:13:15 AM PST by Ispy4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
I believe Bush has performed well as a CinC in Afghanistan and Iraq...and in the War on Terror in general. In the Dragon's Fury Series I allude to that all along, indicating that the War on Terror went well.

My point in this regard in the series is that many leaders believe that a global war is only a remote possibility. I happen to believe it may be right at our door step.

I put in the figurative and idealic leader in the series because of the other things I wanted to accomplish in the series with respect to the 2nd Amendment, immigration, energy production and ultimately issues like abortion.

In an all out war scenario, where we are taken unawares, very quick action on these first issues (immigration, energy producton, onshore manufacturnig, the 2nd amendment, etc.) will be paramount IMHO, if we are to come back up to a full war time footing fast enough to eventually "Turn the Tide". I am not sure Bush would have the inclination, or the ability to move quickly on some of these issues.

IMHO, we should have already done so after 9-11 IMHO.

28 posted on 11/06/2003 5:14:21 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; Ispy4u
There is a "command climate investigation" underway.

Those investigations get started when multiple folks inside the unit formally express concern up the chain of command regarding the CO's overall conduct.

In other words, there's a LOT more going on than me or thee know about, and this was probably the mildest breach of the rules the investigation team found.
29 posted on 11/06/2003 5:17:51 AM PST by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ispy4u
I am not wrong...he did perform his higher responsibility. But he did it knowing that he would necessarily be disciplined...and he did it in spite of that fact, taking full responsibility and perferring to save American lives rather than be concerned about his own career.

THAT is the mark of a true leader, and even though he may be disciplined for it...I applaud his actions and pray to God that there are more like him.

I know I would want my own sons serving under such a man.

30 posted on 11/06/2003 5:17:51 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GopherIt
If disciplinary procedures are to be followed, so be it. The breach of faith occurs here: the "offer" of voluntary resignation to a 19-year valor-decorated soldier to avoid the hassle. That is despicable and dishonorable. Whoever came up with that idea has no honor, no pride, no soul.

My sentiments exactly.

31 posted on 11/06/2003 5:18:35 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
May well be...we shall see.

My comments are directed at this specific charge and this specific instance. M

If there is more...I am sure it will come out.

32 posted on 11/06/2003 5:20:02 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; Travis McGee; harpseal; tet68; sneakypete; wardaddy; A Navy Vet
Comments?
33 posted on 11/06/2003 5:20:59 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
No one is talking this up...and they should.

-----

I will do my best to get this information known.
34 posted on 11/06/2003 5:22:07 AM PST by maica (Leadership matters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I will. And I will do what else I can. This warrior deserves the support of the American people.

We must rally to his defense and make sure he is saved, if for no other reason but to ensure that other warriors will know that they to will be defended by their patriotic countryman if they are ever faced with the same situation.
35 posted on 11/06/2003 5:22:56 AM PST by Ronin (Qui docet discit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I could also argue that he acted in the manner he did for self preservation.

Very little attention has been given to the initial tip, that the policeman they detained was in on a plot to assassinate LTC West.

Now I give the man the benefit of the doubt, and choose to belive that he was more interested in saving soldiers lives than his own, but knowing human nature it still leaves a nagging question in the back of my mind.
36 posted on 11/06/2003 5:23:26 AM PST by Ispy4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ispy4u
I hope you are not an officer in the U.S. Armed Forces and if you are I hope none of my family or friends is under your command.
37 posted on 11/06/2003 5:25:46 AM PST by Ronin (Qui docet discit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Bump!
38 posted on 11/06/2003 5:27:23 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ispy4u
There is room for that concern.

Like you, I prefer to give him the benefit of the doubt and believe he was acting in the interest of his troops.

The investigation should bear it out one way or another.

In the mean time, I would hope more offiers would be willing to go to these lengths to take the fight to the enemy and preserve American lives in so doing...with their career and personal issues being only a secondary concern.

39 posted on 11/06/2003 5:28:19 AM PST by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Great post. Let's support West.
40 posted on 11/06/2003 5:28:57 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 401-417 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson