[dr_who_2]

Next Year: "Was Jesus really a female?"

The Year After Next Year: "Was Jesus really a Zoastrian priest from Syria?"

The Year After The Year After Next: "Was Jesus an alien from outer space?"

[Terridan]

They think, if ya keep telling the same lie, it will be believed. Don't be shocked... here, Christmas represents a Santa or an ornament, (Star of David on Chanuka though) on our school calenders, and Easter is represented by a bunny. Nowhere are there Christian symbols or holidays. Now, trashing Christ is the new campaign over the networks. Funny, but the kids out here believe it all. There is no God, no Christ and everything on TV is real. It is not easy being a Christian, as now our churches are being infiltrated by gays. We can only hope to keep the few traditionalist churches we have, but it is a battle we will continue to support.

[Cronos]

Correct. The show's supposition is just that, a supposition. I could guess that Winston Churchill was actually a Zulu warrior who killed the real Wnston Churchill and then took on his identity using voodoo. Funny? Silly? H**** yeah. Anyone can make guesses and try to potray them as facts. That's why I will not watch that show and I will not watch ABC. Hit 'em where it hurts, in their ratings.

[pepsionice]

You forgot.....would Jesus prefer Pepsi or Coke?

[gcruse]

the unregenerate carnal mind

This point was made well on the TV show.  Hostile denials of the possibility
of Jesus being married when the scriptures are pretty much neutral in this
regard, imply the question of whether Jesus' being married would be a thing
of   dirtiness and carnality.  This view of married sex limns a religion wholly
out of touch with the need for human continuity.  I don't particularly believe
Jesus married,  but if he did, how could that possibly be a negative thing
for believers?