Clinton used the WMD intelligence info to bomb Iraq. If Bush is "guilty of lies", wouldn't Clinton's claim (along with all the Democrats who agreed with him at the time) Saddam had WMD's also be a crime? Did Bill Clinton's administration also lie to us?
Where did Bill Clinton get his WMD information to bomb Iraq in 1998? Where did the Democrats that supported his attack get their WMD information? Why would their intel information be acceptable enough to war with Iraq when Clinton attacked, yet it's not acceptable now?
We need an investigation to find out if Saddam really had WMDs as far back as 1998, when our government was telling us he had, and where did that information start?
The only way to sort all this out is to start at the very beginning. Right after Desert storm, because we know he had them at the time.
Clinton admin intelligence was only a SMALL part of the mix, but it was poured in after only cursery inspection and stirred in with the rest in order to complete the concatenation process and arrive at an answer. This is how it's supposed to be done, but...uh...well...it was an obvious mistake.
Mentioning way back when that the data may be skewed because of the type of people who started making the "sexed-up" charges, and needs to be examined because those people should have had any understanding of the ingredients added to the process, only earns you a tinfoil hat award rather than serious consideration. It's a gut instinct thing. In retrospect, it seems that the people calling for careful reexamination of that data were right.