epage@bhamnews.com;mailbox@postherald.com;htimes@htimes.com;letters@adn.com;editor1@alaska.net; Opinions@pni.com;letters@azstarnet.com;letters@cctimes.com;DNForum@dailynews.com;letters@latimes.com; redaccion@laopinion.com;triblet@angnewspapers.com;ocregister@link.freedom.com;opinion@sacbee.com; letters@uniontrib.com;letters@sfchronicle.com;letters@sfexaminer.com;letters@sjmercury.com;letters@denverpost.com; carrollv@RockyMountainNews.com;letters@courant.com;njletter@newsjournal.com;letters@washpost.com; letters@washingtontimes.com;kguy@sun-sentinel.com;tuletters@timesunion.com;HeraldEd@herald.com; insight@orlandosentinel.com;jreingold@pbdailynews.com;letters@pbpost.com;editor.letters@herald-trib. com;letters@sptimes.com;tdedit@taldem.com;tribletters@tampatrib.com;constitution@ajc.com; letters@honoluluadvertiser.com;editorial@boise.gannett.com;fencepost@dailyherald.com;letters@suntimes.com; bdold@tribune.com;stareditor@starnews.com;letters@news.dmreg.com;weedit@wichitaeagle.com; hleditorial@herald-leader.com;cjletter@louisv02.gannett.com;tpletters@aol.com;letters@pressherald.com; letters@baltsun.com;letter@globe.com;letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com;letters@union-news.com; letters@telegram.com;letters@freepress.com;letters@detnews.com;pulse@gr-press.com;opinion@startribune.com; letters@pioneerpress.com;letters@jackson.gannett.com;letters@kcstar.com;letters@postnet.com;speakup@billingsgazette.com; opinion@missoulian.com;pulse@owh.com;letters@lvrj.com;letters@lasvegassun.com;letters@theunionleader.com; yourviews@app.com;LettersToTheEditor@NorthJersey.com;eletters@starledger.com;opinion@abqjournal.com; tuletters@timesunion.com;LetterToEditor@buffnews.com;letters@newsday.com;voicers@edit.nydailynews.com; letters@nypost.com;letters@nytimes.com;letters@syracuse.com;opinion@charlotte.com;forum@nando.com; letters@wsjournal.com;letters@forumcomm.com;vop@thebeaconjournal.com;letters@enquirer.com; postedits@cincypost.com;letters@plaind.com;letters@dispatch.com; edletter@coxohio.com;letters@theblade.com; yourviews@oklahoman.com;letters@tulsaworld.com;letters@news.oregonian.com;editpage@patriot-news.com; Views@phillynews.com;Inquirer.Letters@phillynews.com;letters@post-gazette.com;opinion@tribweb.com;letters@projo.com; editor@postandcourier.com;stateeditor@thestate.com;editor@argusleader.com;kns@knoxnews.com;letters@gomemphis.com; letters@tennessean.com;letters@statesman.com;letterstoeditor@dallasnews.com;letters@star-telegram.com;viewpoints@chron.com; letters@express-news.net;letters@desnews.com;letters@sltrib.com;letters@bfp.burlingtonfreepress.com;letters@pilotonline.com; letters@timesdispatch.com;editpage@seattle-pi.com;opinion@seattletimes.com;editor@spokane.net;letters@mail.tribnet.com; letters@wvgazette.com;jsedit@onwis.com;letters@trib.com;oreilly@foxnews.com;hannity@foxnews.com;Comments@foxnews.com; Cavuto@foxnews.com;Friends@foxnews.com;Comments@foxnews.com;Foxreport@foxnews.com;Special@foxnews.com; Studiob@foxnews.com;Beltway@foxnews.com;Myword@foxnews.com;Cavuto@foxnews.com
This leak is definitely a trigger lock for the intellectually challenged One-Bullet Barney.
1: HEAR, HEAR! That memo is blatant abuse of power. This is the Senate INTELLIGENCE Committee! Oxymoron jokes aside, this is serious business. The political hackjob plan outlined in the memo against both the DoD and CnC is SO far outside the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence's JOB that it's on the far side of an alternate universe!
2: The way that memo was organized and worded has Hillary all over it. If she didn't write it, she was consulted to heavily she practically dictated it.
3: The Democrat response : that this memo proves the Democrat's case for an independant counsel was astounding. They must have been up late into the night coming up with that one. My gut response was "Yes, Intelligence Committee memo might warrant an independant investigator." Of course that's not what the Dems meant, but it is true.