Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cancelled Reagan Miniseries Was 'a Stinker,' Says Critic
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 11/05/03 | Marc Morano

Posted on 11/05/2003 3:12:09 AM PST by kattracks

(CNSNews.com) - A conservative media critic Tuesday called CBS's cancellation of the miniseries about former President Ronald Reagan "an amazing development" designed to obscure the reality that the movie was "a stinker." Democrats and liberals also decried the network's cancellation, with one website declaring a "Right-Wing Jihad Makes CBS Quiver."

Michael Medved, author of the book Hollywood vs. America and a nationally syndicated radio talk show host, said CBS and its parent company Viacom were caught off guard by the overwhelming response by conservative critics, government officials, talk show hosts, special interest groups and other Reagan supporters.

"They were probably surprised by the intensity of the emotion," Medved told CNSNews.com, adding that Viacom's decision to shift the miniseries to CBS' sister pay-cable network, Showtime, represented "an amazing development." The miniseries had previously been scheduled to air on CBS Nov. 16 and 18.

In recent days, a number of Republicans and conservatives had blasted CBS for what they considered an unflattering portrayal of President Reagan, played by actor James Brolin.

The criticism was based on excerpts from the script of the miniseries that had found their way to the press. According to published reports, the former president was to be portrayed as having a callous disregard for AIDS victims and as a man who compared himself to the "anti-Christ." The script also failed to note the record economic expansion during Reagan's years and the demise of communism.

But the public pressure on CBS may not have been the only factor in the decision to cancel the miniseries and relegate it to Showtime, according to Medved. "I think the dirty little secret was the thing was a stinker," Medved said.

"Leaving aside its content or its political slant, my guess is CBS is deciding to save itself embarrassment all around," Medved added.

CBS President Les Moonves will be able to gain a double advantage by canceling the movie, according to Medved.

"Moonves will be able to escape embarrassment by not running a stinker series at the same time he can blame those nasty right wingers," Medved said.

In a statement released Tuesday, Viacom said it made the decision after seeing the final cut of the show.

"Although the miniseries features impressive production values and acting performances, and although the producers have sources to verify each scene in the script, we believe it does not present a balanced portrayal of the Reagans for CBS and its audience," the Viacom statement read.

'Right-wing jihad'

Liberals and other Reagan detractors spared no criticism of CBS for the decision to cancel.

The left wing website, BuzzFlash.com, alleged in headlines Tuesday that the network had capitulated to pressure. "Right-Wing Jihad Makes CBS Quiver," the website declared, adding that CBS "should change their name to Cowardly Broadcasting Service or the Censored Broadcasting Service."

BuzzFlash.com said CBS was caving in to "right wing censorship" and accused the Republican Party of turning American "television into [a] Soviet-Style Propaganda Tool."

Others raised the rhetoric even higher.

Noting that CBS had tried to salvage the project by cutting controversial scenes from the Reagan miniseries, Philadelphia Daily News TV critic Ellen Gray drew a comparison between Nazi dictator Adolph Hitler and Ronald Reagan.

"CBS' Hitler miniseries also underwent some changes after an early draft of the script leaked and drew fire. That all those changes were aimed at making Hitler look even worse than he appeared in the original just goes to show you Ronald Reagan has a lot more friends," Gray wrote Tuesday.

U.S. Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) also criticized the decision to cancel the Reagan miniseries.

"It smells of intimidation to me. It sounds to me like they were intimidated," Daschle said Tuesday at a news conference. "And I'm disappointed. I think any time occasions arise when the essence of the judgment made by television producers is influenced by outside forces, we have to call into question whether that level of intimidation is appropriate," Daschle said.

"Whether or not this was the right decision is something left to others to make, but it does again raise the specter of just how powerful some of these special interest groups truly are today," Daschle added.

Many Democrats disputed the Reagan record and urged CBS to cover what they view as the former president's failures.

U.S. Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) wrote an open letter to Moonves last week urging the network to include "some of my recollections of the Reagan years" in "the interest of historical accuracy."

Dingell's "recollections" of Reagan included "$640 Pentagon toilet seats; ketchup as a vegetable; union busting; firing striking air traffic controllers; Iran-Contra; selling arms to terrorist nations; trading arms for hostages" and "apartheid apologia; the savings and loan scandal; voodoo economics."

"I hope you find these facts useful in accurately depicting President Reagan's time in office," wrote Dingell in the conclusion of his Oct. 29 letter.

'Disgustingly poor taste'

A conservative media watchdog group hailed the decision to cancel the miniseries.

"CBS's decision to pull the The Reagans miniseries was a wise one," stated L. Brent Bozell III, president of the Media Research Center, the parent organization of CNSNews.com .

"The original decision to broadcast a factually distorted film about the former president when he is in the latter stages of Alzheimer's disease showed disgustingly poor taste," Bozell added.

The Ronald Reagan Legacy Project, a group dedicated to honoring the legacy of the former president, was pleased with the Viacom/CBS decision.

"CBS has done the right thing," said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), the organization that runs the Ronald Reagan Legacy Project.

"Those of us familiar with the real Reagan record would rather it be dumped entirely, but selling the show to second-tier Showtime is a marked improvement," Norquist said.

Marc Christian, the homosexual partner of the late actor Rock Hudson, also defended Reagan and refuted the CBS script, which reportedly included the former president saying that homosexuals who had developed AIDS deserved to die.

"The notion that a Ronald Reagan was a homophobe strikes me as silly beyond belief," Christian wrote in a letter to CBS's Moonves. Hudson died from AIDS in 1985. The letter was released Tuesday by FrontPagemazine.com columnist Tammy Bruce.

"Not only did he have several gay men on his staff when he was governor of California, he called my lover, Rock Hudson, when he was on his deathbed just weeks before he died of AIDS and wished him well and voiced his and Nancy's concern and prayers," Christian wrote.

"...The Reagans had known Rock for years and knew he was gay (as did most of Hollywood)," Christian's letter continued. "The point is, Reagan could have ignored Rock's illness and didn't," he added.

See Earlier Stories:
CBS Cancels Movie on Ronald Reagan
(Oct. 4, 2003)
Advertisers Urged to Preview Reagan Movie Before Sponsoring (Oct. 28, 2003)
Group Aims to Stop CBS 'Hatchet Job' About Reagans From Airing
(Oct. 30, 2003)

Listen to audio for this story.

E-mail a news tip to Marc Morano.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.




TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cbs; moviereview; reaganmovie; thereagans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: kattracks
I think any time occasions arise when the essence of the judgment made by television producers is influenced by outside forces, we have to call into question whether that level of intimidation is appropriate," Daschle said.

BS I happen to know for a fact it was he who pressured the producers of Dallas to bring Bobby back. Leaving the viewers stuck with a years worth of dreams....

21 posted on 11/05/2003 5:20:12 AM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Morning, nic. Greetings from the general City of Evil area and our new, remarkably attractive, democrat mayor:


22 posted on 11/05/2003 5:20:42 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
"It smells of intimidation to me. It sounds to me like they were intimidated," Daschle said Tuesday at a news conference. "And I'm disappointed. I think any time occasions arise when the essence of the judgment made by television producers is influenced by outside forces, we have to call into question whether that level of intimidation is appropriate," Daschle said.

Then Tom added, "I'm so grateful we Dems are tolerant, compassionate, hate guns and worship abortion. Now, if I could can only get this dumb donkey to move, I'd whomp those Pubbies."

23 posted on 11/05/2003 5:23:02 AM PST by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
How strange that the left is in a tizzy about this show getting the axe. Here is part of a NY Times article that was also printed in the Austin Un-American Liberal Rag today.

"It's clear that CBS has given into the GOP's demands," said Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, a Washington advocacy group. "It's a very bad precedent, and it sends a message to the creative community that no matter how good your work is, it can easily get axed."

Strange, there wasn't ONE LINE about the RAT memo detailing how to derail the Bush Whitehouse from yesterday..... Not that I would expect to see it in that rag...

24 posted on 11/05/2003 5:23:05 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (Laura Ingraham and Ann Coulter are living proof that not all blondes are dumb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
OMG....it resembles a horse, of course! : )
25 posted on 11/05/2003 5:25:14 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Then Tom added, "I'm so grateful we Dems are tolerant, compassionate, hate guns and worship abortion...

LOL. That's a great pic, Liz!

26 posted on 11/05/2003 5:26:15 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Apparently the words "free market" and "public arena" are not in his vocabulary.

Nope; because if you don't vote for a Rat or engage in boycotts, it's all because of "intimidation."

27 posted on 11/05/2003 5:27:54 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
In other words, Little Tommy is telling us that The People shouldn't have a say?

You know, of court, the "People" who vote against Rats or boycott are ALL members of the VRWC--a "special interest group." : )

28 posted on 11/05/2003 5:29:21 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tcostell
Make sure you write a letter and tell them that in no uncertain terms.

29 posted on 11/05/2003 5:30:02 AM PST by Ronin (Qui docet discit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
ooops, court = course.
30 posted on 11/05/2003 5:30:37 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"CBS' Hitler miniseries also underwent some changes after an early draft of the script leaked and drew fire. That all those changes were aimed at making Hitler look even worse than he appeared in the original just goes to show you Ronald Reagan has a lot more friends," Gray wrote Tuesday.

I haven't had my coffee, so maybe I'm missing something. Is this TV journalist suggesting that only pro-Reagan people would demand that Hitler be shown as a bad guy on TV? I mean, I know Hitler was a socialist ... but I thought even the socialists tried to dissociate theselves from him. In this quote it looks like only Republicans would dislike the guy.

31 posted on 11/05/2003 5:31:02 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (France delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunnyUsa; tcostell
A caller on FOX this a.m. said she was cancelling Showtime now.
32 posted on 11/05/2003 5:31:30 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
of course...of course
33 posted on 11/05/2003 5:33:28 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
And yet, when the Left tried to organize a "Boycott Rush" movement several months ago...that was what...exactly?

Left Wing Hypocrisy never ceases to baffle the s#it out of me.
34 posted on 11/05/2003 5:35:39 AM PST by ItsOurTimeNow ("Forth now, and fear no darkness!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow
when the Left tried to organize a "Boycott Rush" movement several months ago...that was what...exactly?

Freedom of Expression (of course, when the conservatives do so, it's called intimidation).

35 posted on 11/05/2003 5:41:32 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The hypocrisy of all this makes me sick. Clearly Daschle and friends have never heard of the liberal onslaught that got Dr. Laura's tv cancelled, nor attempts to have her radio showed cancelled as well. Oh, and there are the constant liberal attacks against Rush, culminating in an almost Palestinian-like victory dance by Ed Asner, Hollywood's most mentally unbalanced liberal, when Rush spoke the truth about Donovan McNabb's less-than-spectacular quarterback abilities- with the threat that Sean Hannity is next. And there really isn't a need to mention the cries of fools like Al Franken and Barbra Streisand, who claim that conservatives are taking over all the media.
36 posted on 11/05/2003 5:42:18 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
"And I'm disappointed. I think any time occasions arise when the essence of the judgment made by television producers is influenced by outside forces, we have to call into question whether that level of intimidation is appropriate," Daschle said.

Those outside forces being... advertisers? Viewers? Movie critics? Good sense? Tact? Responsibility to shareholders? The truth?

The socialist nuts in this country are eventually going to have to admit that America loved and still loves Ronald Reagan. Right, middle and left, you can find his supporters everywhere.

37 posted on 11/05/2003 5:51:08 AM PST by WileyC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; kattracks; nicmarlo
You know, for a party that is poll driven, these leftists are not taking this very well.........hehe....he
38 posted on 11/05/2003 6:19:14 AM PST by ohioWfan (Have you prayed for your President today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Could Daschle be a bigger POS?
39 posted on 11/05/2003 6:22:20 AM PST by clintonh8r (This isn't rocket surgery, people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SunnyUsa
I guess the only thing you can do now is see who is sponsoring it and tell them you aren't happy.
40 posted on 11/05/2003 6:27:04 AM PST by ladylib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson