[Robert A Cook PE]

No, reporting who pulled the feeding tube is irrelevent.

Reporting which doctor REFUSED to re-insert it (under the apparent direct threats of MS at the hospital after the law was passed) ....

THAT is worth reporting.

[Republic]

No, reporting who pulled the feeding tube is irrelevent.

Reporting which doctor REFUSED to re-insert it (under the apparent direct threats of MS at the hospital after the law was passed) ....

THAT is worth reporting.

What? MS threatened a doctor knowing that the law had passed - perhaps the doctor did not...but MS sure did....seems to be this should be actionable and should be used in the case against MS remaining her GUARDIAN! This is explosive!

[Wampus SC]

"No, reporting who pulled the feeding tube is irrelevent."

Not neccessarily. Noory reporting it would be relevant for those who believe that a person has a moral duty to refuse such an order.

"Reporting which doctor REFUSED to re-insert it (under the apparent direct threats of MS at the hospital after the law was passed) ....

"THAT is worth reporting."

Very good point. That would be worth reporting, maybe more so. I'll email Noory with that suggestion.

Does anyone have confirmed information that a doctor refused to reinsert the tube, and if so, who it was?"

[Shortstop7]

Reporting which doctor REFUSED to re-insert it (under the apparent direct threats of MS at the hospital after the law was passed) .... THAT is worth reporting.

I agree.....the Doctor that let that monster intimidate him is nothing but a "low life", imho.