Skip to comments.
Sean Hannity has a scoop on dem party corruption (Vanity)
Sean Hannity radio show ^
| 11/04/03
| Unknown Democrat (via Sean Hannity)
Posted on 11/04/2003 1:27:18 PM PST by jocon307
Is anyone listening to Hannity? He just read a memo from a dem party staffer (i think) on the select committe on intelligence (or some such), which, as he describes it, shows the the dem committe members are pre-planning a political assault on the pres. and care nothing for our security, which is their job.
He's acting like this is the hottest scoop since I don't know what, I'm at work so I'm only 1/2 listening, plus he read the whole thing which seemed to be a least 2 pages long, a little tough to follow being in beaurocrat-speak.
Is this really important? And will this story grow legs?
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004memo; demorats; hannitymemo; intelligence; intelligencememo; patroberts; seanhannity; senatedems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580 ... 821-835 next last
To: Steve_Seattle
I had an argument with a democrat today at my University about the "Bush Lied To Get Us Into War" today. I told him (and the others listening, quite a few, in fact) that Bush said EXACTLY what Clinton said in 1998, and 1999, and Joe Liebermann, and Algore, and Madeline Albright, and all the rest of the Dem politicos. You coulda heard a pin drop after that. They had no way to respond. I also re-emphasized the 9/11 attacks, and what were we supposed to do, sit around and wait for Saddam to give Al Qeada a weapon to kill American civilians with? And all this AFTER Clinton said what he said?
The Dem actually agreed I had a good point!
To: Pukin Dog
It might get carried carefully worded with a headline about the Bush Mishandled IRAQ, and whispers of the rest.
542
posted on
11/04/2003 4:17:01 PM PST
by
My back yard
(Not in my bow do I trust, nor does my sword bring me victory.)
To: HarryCaul; b4its2late
IMHO...I think this was leaked to stop the hanky panky on the committee.....look what the memo states about getting Roberts to roll over on an investigating of Rumsfeld...
This blunts the RATS and it blunts the RINO's into going along with the RATS.
543
posted on
11/04/2003 4:18:21 PM PST
by
Dog
To: HarryCaul
Without trying to sound ridiculous, in "retort" to your question......
I honestly believe the most Democrats are unable to follow anything unless it's written down and/or repeated over and over and over, like a mantra. They are like lemmings. They are incapable of independent thought. They form groups, and subgroups, so that they can always follow someone. They write memos so they can follow the someone with him/her being nearby. They cannot remember things without writing them down because they're afraid they won't "conform" to the group's expectations. They have, in short, become unable to think independently or coherently. Perhaps this sounds overly ridiculous and exaggerated, but when was the last time you heard a Democrat question group think? When was the last time you heard a Democrat disagree with or condemn another Democrat?
I did, last night, Zell Miller. And that's the only Democrat I've ever heard tell the truth.
To: concerned about politics
And it will cost the tax payers $$$$$$$$$!!! in additional "investigations."
I don't give a rat's ass about the cost as long as we get the Rat's ass who is guilty.
To: b4its2late
Did you hear the Rockefeller memo said someone took the memo out of the trash??? That must mean it was in 97's crusty pantsuit pocket.
546
posted on
11/04/2003 4:19:30 PM PST
by
Neets
(Obsession, it's not just a fragrance anymore.)
To: concerned about politics
"We need to work in a bipartisan manner." Bipartisan....another one of those words in liberalese, roughly translated: we need to make everybody see it OUR way.
547
posted on
11/04/2003 4:20:19 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Dog
YEA!!!!.. More Bad news for the Dems
548
posted on
11/04/2003 4:20:39 PM PST
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: demkicker
I don't give a rat's ass about the cost as long as we get the Rat's ass who is guilty. I don't care about the cost of investigating this. It's a real memo. It should be looked into.
I mean the fake investigations the Dems want against Bush . Clinton said the same thing, so wouldn't we have to investigate that too? Why stop at Bush?
To: Lazamataz
PROUDLY SCARING GROPING FELLOW FREEPERS SINCE 1999 !!!!
550
posted on
11/04/2003 4:22:05 PM PST
by
stands2reason
(REWARD! Tagline missing since 10/21. Pithy, clever. Last seen in Chat. Sentimental value.)
To: Dog
I dunno. I hope not.
Roberts didn't sound too pleased. His BP was definitely elevated.
Time will tell.
551
posted on
11/04/2003 4:22:11 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(You know why women over 50 don't have babies: They would put them down somewhere and forget.)
To: StarFan; Dutchy; Timesink; Gracey; Alamo-Girl; RottiBiz; bamabaseballmom; FoxGirl; Mr. Bob; ...
FoxFan ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my FoxFan list. *Warning: This can be a high-volume ping list at times.
552
posted on
11/04/2003 4:22:19 PM PST
by
nutmeg
(Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
To: Neets
See that. I knew the slicks were involved in same manner..... LOL!
553
posted on
11/04/2003 4:23:36 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(You know why women over 50 don't have babies: They would put them down somewhere and forget.)
To: concerned about politics
554
posted on
11/04/2003 4:23:46 PM PST
by
Mo1
(http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
To: Neets; b4its2late; Mo1
What is great......we all are going to get a good nights sleep while Rockefeller and his staff fend off irate calls to their office from the other pissed off DEMS.
555
posted on
11/04/2003 4:24:08 PM PST
by
Dog
To: truthkeeper
"He said the reason he's on with Sean right now is because his phone started ringing off the hook and he was told by another member that he'd better get on with Sean to clear the air." Well, that right there says that it rattled enough cages to get SOMEBODY trying to run damage control. It isn't like these people make a habit of calling into talk shows.
556
posted on
11/04/2003 4:24:59 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: Dog; Mo1
What is great......we all are going to get a good nights sleep while Rockefeller and his staff fend off irate calls to their office from the other pissed off DEMS.
To: Dog
Not to mention that humming sound from the shredders...... It's like the clinton wh all over again............
558
posted on
11/04/2003 4:26:17 PM PST
by
b4its2late
(You know why women over 50 don't have babies: They would put them down somewhere and forget.)
To: Dog
Brit had this on his show tonight and said that Roberts, the rather dense Rep. senator from Kansas, had called Jay Rockefeller to his office and read him the riot act. Brit read a statement from Rockefeller that said that was an "unauthorized" memo that someone must have dug out of the garbage or gotten off a computer, but he didn't deny that it existed...very telling. The Republicans ought to roast the dems on this one, but will they?
To: Mo1
Excellent Mo1, excellent. Thank you for your hard work. Much appreciated.
560
posted on
11/04/2003 4:28:57 PM PST
by
onyx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540, 541-560, 561-580 ... 821-835 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson